Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Exclude list for FIPS140-3 strict profile #61

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: openj9
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

JinhangZhang
Copy link
Contributor

Adding tests to be ignored for FIPS140-3 strict profile.

@jasonkatonica FYI

@JinhangZhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

@keithc-ca please help to review

Signed-off-by: Jinhang Zhang <Jinhang.Zhang@ibm.com>
@keithc-ca
Copy link
Member

Is this a back-port of ibmruntimes/openj9-openjdk-jdk#861? If so, it helps to explicitly call out such facts.

@keithc-ca
Copy link
Member

There is a significant number of differences relative to the head stream: Please explain the reason for each such difference.

@JinhangZhang
Copy link
Contributor Author

If so, it helps to explicitly call out such facts.

Hi @keithc-ca , it's not a back-port of the headstream, each semeru jdk version has different failed cases.

@keithc-ca
Copy link
Member

I find it difficult to understand why we have so many differences between jdk23 and the head stream, particularly those tests which are excluded in jdk23 but not in the head stream when the tests appear to be identical. For example

  • com/sun/crypto/provider/Cipher/Test4958071.java
  • com/sun/crypto/provider/KeyProtector/IterationCount.java
  • com/sun/crypto/provider/Mac/Test6205692.java
  • java/security/AccessController/DoPrivAccompliceTest.java
  • java/security/Policy/ExtensiblePolicy/ExtensiblePolicyWithJarTest.java
  • etc.

The other way around would make more sense to me (a test works in jdk23, but not (yet) in the head stream). Please provide more information than just to state that "each semeru jdk version has different failed cases".

@keithc-ca
Copy link
Member

Please provide more information

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants