Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Single App Force Deployment #124

Open
wants to merge 4 commits into
base: trunk
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

davidplappert
Copy link
Member

@davidplappert davidplappert commented Feb 22, 2024

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Enhanced the build process to include an option for running tasks affected by changes.
    • Added a new input parameter to control affected builds.
    • Updated commands to run tasks with verbosity based on input parameters.
    • Removed the default value for the app input parameter.
    • Reorganized the main job steps to conditionally run tasks based on the presence of the app input.
    • Adjusted the commands to run tasks accordingly based on the input parameter.

Signed-off-by: David Plappert <davidplappert@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 22, 2024

Warning

Rate Limit Exceeded

@davidplappert has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 32 seconds before requesting another review.

How to resolve this issue?

After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit.

How do rate limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization.
Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout.
Please see our FAQ for further information.

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between e8abf88 and 001ad99.

Walkthrough

The recent changes in the workflow involve removing the default value for the app input parameter, reorganizing the main job steps to conditionally run tasks based on the input, and adjusting task execution commands accordingly. These modifications aim to enhance the workflow's flexibility and efficiency by customizing task execution based on inputs.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/workflows/production-release.yml Removed default value for app input; Reorganized main job steps; Adjusted task execution based on input

🐇✨
In the realm of code, where changes abound,
A clever rabbit hopped and found,
A switch to flip, for builds refined,
Only the affected, it now defined.
With each leap and bound, it declared,
"Let verbosity shine, when onlyeffected is aired!"
🌟🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

Copy link

nx-cloud bot commented Feb 22, 2024

☁️ Nx Cloud Report

CI is running/has finished running commands for commit 001ad99. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights.

📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution


✅ Successfully ran 4 targets

Sent with 💌 from NxCloud.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6ffba92 and a6ce5f3.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/production-release.yml (5 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
.github/workflows/production-release.yml (3)
  • 29-38: > 📝 NOTE

This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [32-47]

The logic within the Set argument variables step is unchanged and continues to set output variables based on the event type. This part of the workflow does not directly relate to the onlyeffected parameter but is crucial for setting up the arguments for later steps. No issues or improvements are identified here.

  • 64-74: The conditional logic to execute tasks with increased verbosity based on the onlyeffected parameter is correctly implemented. This change effectively uses the parameter to decide between running nx affected and nx run-many commands, aligning with the PR's objectives to enhance build process efficiency and customization. However, ensure that the nx-cloud actions and the nx CLI used in this workflow support the --verbose flag as expected, especially in the context of these commands.
  • 140-140: The environment variables set in the run many deployments step, including CONSOLE_BUCKET_PROD and CONSOLE_DISTRIBUTION_ID_PROD, are correctly configured to use secrets. This ensures secure handling of sensitive information. No changes are needed here.

Comment on lines 13 to 16
onlyeffected:
type: boolean
description: "Only Build Affected?"
required: true
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The addition of the onlyeffected input parameter is well-defined with a clear type, description, and requirement status. This change aligns with the PR objectives to allow for more granular control over the build process. However, consider adding a default value to ensure backward compatibility and ease of use for workflows that may not specify this parameter explicitly.

  onlyeffected:
    type: boolean
    description: "Only Build Affected?"
+   default: false
    required: true

Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.

Suggested change
onlyeffected:
type: boolean
description: "Only Build Affected?"
required: true
onlyeffected:
type: boolean
description: "Only Build Affected?"
default: false
required: true

Signed-off-by: David Plappert <davidplappert@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 1

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between a6ce5f3 and 298a735.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/production-release.yml (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
.github/workflows/production-release.yml (1)
  • 105-105: The environment variables CONSOLE_BUCKET_PROD and CONSOLE_DISTRIBUTION_ID_PROD are correctly passed to the deployment step. This ensures that sensitive information is securely handled using GitHub secrets. However, it's crucial to regularly review and rotate these secrets to maintain security best practices.

Comment on lines +29 to +39
if [ -z "${{ github.event.inputs.app }}" ]; then
npx nx affected --target=lint --parallel=3
npx nx affected --target=test --parallel=3 --ci --code-coverage
npx nx affected --target=build --parallel=3
npx nx affected --target=e2e --parallel=3 --ci
else
npx nx run ${{ github.event.inputs.app }}:lint
npx nx run ${{ github.event.inputs.app }}:test --ci --code-coverage
npx nx run ${{ github.event.inputs.app }}:build
npx nx run ${{ github.event.inputs.app }}:e2e --ci
fi
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The conditional logic based on the app input parameter is a good approach to selectively run tasks. However, it's important to ensure that the app parameter is correctly documented and understood by users, especially since its default value has been removed. This change increases the flexibility of the workflow but also adds a layer of complexity that requires clear documentation for proper use.

Consider adding comments within the workflow file or updating the repository's README to explain how the app parameter should be used and its impact on the workflow execution.

Signed-off-by: David Plappert <davidplappert@users.noreply.github.com>
Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 298a735 and e8abf88.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/workflows/production-release.yml (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • .github/workflows/production-release.yml

Signed-off-by: David Plappert <davidplappert@users.noreply.github.com>
@davidplappert davidplappert changed the title Update production-release.yml Single App Force Deployment Feb 22, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@kristinmerbach kristinmerbach left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants