-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Single App Force Deployment #124
base: trunk
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: David Plappert <davidplappert@users.noreply.github.com>
Warning Rate Limit Exceeded@davidplappert has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 11 minutes and 32 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. WalkthroughThe recent changes in the workflow involve removing the default value for the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
☁️ Nx Cloud ReportCI is running/has finished running commands for commit 001ad99. As they complete they will appear below. Click to see the status, the terminal output, and the build insights. 📂 See all runs for this CI Pipeline Execution ✅ Successfully ran 4 targetsSent with 💌 from NxCloud. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/production-release.yml (5 hunks)
Additional comments: 3
.github/workflows/production-release.yml (3)
- 29-38: > 📝 NOTE
This review was outside the diff hunks and was mapped to the diff hunk with the greatest overlap. Original lines [32-47]
The logic within the
Set argument variables
step is unchanged and continues to set output variables based on the event type. This part of the workflow does not directly relate to theonlyeffected
parameter but is crucial for setting up the arguments for later steps. No issues or improvements are identified here.
- 64-74: The conditional logic to execute tasks with increased verbosity based on the
onlyeffected
parameter is correctly implemented. This change effectively uses the parameter to decide between runningnx affected
andnx run-many
commands, aligning with the PR's objectives to enhance build process efficiency and customization. However, ensure that thenx-cloud
actions and thenx
CLI used in this workflow support the--verbose
flag as expected, especially in the context of these commands.- 140-140: The environment variables set in the
run many deployments
step, includingCONSOLE_BUCKET_PROD
andCONSOLE_DISTRIBUTION_ID_PROD
, are correctly configured to use secrets. This ensures secure handling of sensitive information. No changes are needed here.
onlyeffected: | ||
type: boolean | ||
description: "Only Build Affected?" | ||
required: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The addition of the onlyeffected
input parameter is well-defined with a clear type, description, and requirement status. This change aligns with the PR objectives to allow for more granular control over the build process. However, consider adding a default value to ensure backward compatibility and ease of use for workflows that may not specify this parameter explicitly.
onlyeffected:
type: boolean
description: "Only Build Affected?"
+ default: false
required: true
Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation.
onlyeffected: | |
type: boolean | |
description: "Only Build Affected?" | |
required: true | |
onlyeffected: | |
type: boolean | |
description: "Only Build Affected?" | |
default: false | |
required: true |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/production-release.yml (3 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
.github/workflows/production-release.yml (1)
- 105-105: The environment variables
CONSOLE_BUCKET_PROD
andCONSOLE_DISTRIBUTION_ID_PROD
are correctly passed to the deployment step. This ensures that sensitive information is securely handled using GitHub secrets. However, it's crucial to regularly review and rotate these secrets to maintain security best practices.
if [ -z "${{ github.event.inputs.app }}" ]; then | ||
npx nx affected --target=lint --parallel=3 | ||
npx nx affected --target=test --parallel=3 --ci --code-coverage | ||
npx nx affected --target=build --parallel=3 | ||
npx nx affected --target=e2e --parallel=3 --ci | ||
else | ||
npx nx run ${{ github.event.inputs.app }}:lint | ||
npx nx run ${{ github.event.inputs.app }}:test --ci --code-coverage | ||
npx nx run ${{ github.event.inputs.app }}:build | ||
npx nx run ${{ github.event.inputs.app }}:e2e --ci | ||
fi |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The conditional logic based on the app
input parameter is a good approach to selectively run tasks. However, it's important to ensure that the app
parameter is correctly documented and understood by users, especially since its default value has been removed. This change increases the flexibility of the workflow but also adds a layer of complexity that requires clear documentation for proper use.
Consider adding comments within the workflow file or updating the repository's README to explain how the app
parameter should be used and its impact on the workflow execution.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/production-release.yml (3 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- .github/workflows/production-release.yml
Signed-off-by: David Plappert <davidplappert@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Summary by CodeRabbit
app
input parameter.main
job steps to conditionally run tasks based on the presence of theapp
input.