Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Should the SAA always inform the IETF at level 1 (cooling off period)? #11

Closed
elear opened this issue Oct 4, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

Should the SAA always inform the IETF at level 1 (cooling off period)? #11

elear opened this issue Oct 4, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@elear
Copy link

elear commented Oct 4, 2019

To avoid unnecessary embarrassment, might it make sense to offer the individual the option of not having that note sent, with the caveat that continued violation can lead to a posting rights suspension?
@mnot
Copy link

mnot commented Oct 12, 2019

I question whether we should be optimising to avoid embarrassment of people who have behaved unprofessionally as a first order concern; see #14.

@elear
Copy link
Author

elear commented Oct 12, 2019

Let's merge this with #14.

@elear elear closed this as completed Oct 12, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@mnot @elear