You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Thanks for sharing your greate work.
I have tested your mask_rcnn_FPN code, and got the right result of bbox detecting, but wrong result of seg.
I have pasted the result of eval_mask_FPN AP as follows:
bbox
seg
And the demo_mask_FPN also shows a wrong result as follows:
Furthermore, I test the mask_rcnn_c4_2x-resnet50 model, and the result is same as yours.
So is there something wrong with mask_rcnn_FPN ?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Hi, @ignacio-rocco, I have tested these two models
and can't get the right result.
I just test the 35861858 model again, and also get the wrong semantic-mask result but right bbox.
Thanks for sharing your greate work.
I have tested your mask_rcnn_FPN code, and
got the right result of bbox detecting
, butwrong result of seg
.I have pasted the result of eval_mask_FPN AP as follows:
And the demo_mask_FPN also shows a wrong result as follows:
mask_rcnn_c4_2x-resnet50 model
, and the result is same as yours.So is there something wrong with
mask_rcnn_FPN
?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: