You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Problem described in alignment-models/issues/7: When converting recipe graphs, into action graphs, nodes or sub-graphs can get cut off creating disconnected action graphs.
Proposed solution: Add one empty head node to each recipe graph, s.t. from all other nodes, there is a path to this head node and this node will be preserved in all conversions such as conversion to action graphs or FAT graphs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Other solution: Assuming that, if the sub-graphs are disconnected, the respective parts of the recipe could be executed independently, i.e. one after the other. Therefore we could connect the sub-graphs sequentially. Contra: doesn't preserve the information where the graphs were disonnected originally.
TheresaSchmidt
changed the title
Add empty nodes to collect disonnected graphs
Add empty nodes to collect disonnected graphs?
Jul 14, 2022
Problem described in alignment-models/issues/7: When converting recipe graphs, into action graphs, nodes or sub-graphs can get cut off creating disconnected action graphs.
Proposed solution: Add one empty head node to each recipe graph, s.t. from all other nodes, there is a path to this head node and this node will be preserved in all conversions such as conversion to action graphs or FAT graphs.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: