-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support for filter #53
Conversation
24f3c8d
to
4da33cf
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Not tested, but code review indicates we should assess whether a viable SQL injection exploit is being introduced.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we're safe from an SQL injection perspective.
I also haven't tested. My main concern is the changes in other areas unrelated to adding filters, it's possible that some of the main GitHub actions workflow changes were not expected. I'd appreciate confirmation/explanation on this.
@isc-rsingh should there be someone other than me reviewing this from an InterSystems dev perspective? Maybe Brett?
I'm hoping the CI changes will fix the CI failure in my #54 PR once merged. Ideally they would have been on their own PR, but I can live with them being part of this one. |
Added support for filters, e.g. to hide Ens packages use
'Ens*