Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better documentation and tutorials #66

Open
rklaehn opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

Better documentation and tutorials #66

rklaehn opened this issue Apr 15, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@rklaehn
Copy link
Member

rklaehn commented Apr 15, 2021

If I understand correctly, the intention is to have the ipfs-embed interface more or less stable from now on.

I think now would be a good time to write more documentation, including examples for how to use the different components.

  • writing the docs might lead to some improvements in the APIs
  • It would be very useful for people to get started with ipfs
  • If the examples are checked on build, that would provide additional insurance and incentives to keep the interface stable.
@amtoine
Copy link

amtoine commented Jan 6, 2023

hello there 👋 😋

I think now would be a good time to write more documentation, including examples for how to use the different components.

is there anything being done in that direction? 😮

i am starting a new professional project about IPFS in rust 🦀
to the best of the knowledge of my team and I, the rust implementations of IPFS boil down to

in the end, ipfs-rust/ipfs-embed looks very cool and promising but, to be honest, i'm completely lost in the project and even struggle running it 🤔

i would love to see more documentation and a demo or end product to help users understand what the contribution of ipfs-rust/ipfs-embed is 😌 ⭐

  • writing the docs might lead to some improvements in the APIs
  • It would be very useful for people to get started with ipfs
  • If the examples are checked on build, that would provide additional insurance and incentives to keep the interface stable.

agree with all of these 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants