Should IDE created classes be synched back to project? #1087
-
When I edit my JBang enabled Java file with My observation is that these additional, IDE created, source files are only available when I execute the run.java from my IDE. Is this expected behaviour? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment 1 reply
-
It's expected in the way that we know about it, but it's not exactly what we would like :-) Just to give a bit of an idea as to the kind of problems we're facing here:
These are all issues that would trip up an IDE, so to make sure that everything works okay we create a separate project directory with the proper folder structure and with proper file names (which are links back to the original files). This works fine (as long as you're on Linux or Mac that is, on Windows is a whole other story) as long as you don't add any new files (as you noticed) and as long as you're happy to just be able to edit a single file (and it's defined //SOURCES dependencies) as opposed to be able to edit all files in a folder. So we know about the problem, we're just not sure yet about the solution :-) |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
It's expected in the way that we know about it, but it's not exactly what we would like :-)
We're currently trying to define how we want
edit
to behave and how to implement that.Just to give a bit of an idea as to the kind of problems we're facing here:
.java
extension (egjbang run myprog
)package my.org
does not need to be in a folder calledmy/org
)These are all issues that would trip up an IDE, so to make sure that ev…