Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Task 344: fix Codacy patterm Switch shoud contain default case and should have … #346

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

tsvetaevAlex
Copy link
Collaborator

Task: #344
…at least 3 cases

IMPORTANT: Please do not create a Pull Request without creating an issue first.

Any change needs to be discussed before proceeding. Failure to do so may result in the rejection of the pull request.

Please provide enough information so that others can review your pull request:

Explain the details for making this change. What existing problem does the pull request solve?

Test plan (required)

Demonstrate the code is solid. Example: The exact commands you ran and their output, screenshots / videos if the pull request changes UI.

Code formatting

Closing issues

Put closes #XXXX in your comment to auto-close the issue that your PR fixes (if such).

@tsvetaevAlex tsvetaevAlex requested a review from a team June 12, 2020 07:54
@tsvetaevAlex tsvetaevAlex linked an issue Jun 12, 2020 that may be closed by this pull request
@tsvetaevAlex tsvetaevAlex requested review from v3rde and removed request for a team June 12, 2020 08:21
1.ffix Codcy pattern: 
      "switch" statements should have at least 3 "case" clauses
3. Fix switach statement syntax issue: default case should be included.
1.ffix COdcy pattern: 
      "switch" statements should have at least 3 "case" clauses
3. Fix switach statement syntax issue: default case should be included.
@tsvetaevAlex tsvetaevAlex deleted the Task344_Switch-clauses-Qty branch June 17, 2020 11:59
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
⚠ .Codacy CodacyWarning
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant