You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
it does not make sense to merge whole rows or whole columns (as it just became single row/column), thus we are not really merging columns or rows but cells
we can consider one cell as master cell in merged group of cell -- i.e. the most top-left cell we can call master and other can be said that are just "duplicates"
most of the cases for having merged cells is to provide hierarchies in header
My first idea is to represent cells using csvw extension namespace kbss-csvw:
ex:some-master-cell a kbss-csvw:Cell;
ex:row ex:row1;
ex:column ex:coll1;
kbss-csvw:same-value-as ex:cell-2 ;
kbss-csvw:same-value-as ex:cell-3 ;
.
ex:cell-2 a kbss-csvw:Cell;
ex:row ex:row1;
ex:column ex:coll2;
.
ex:cell-3 a kbss-csvw:Cell;
ex:row ex:row1;
ex:column ex:coll3;
.
kbss-csvw:same-value-as should be transitive and symetric relation but we for us it is sufficient to assert it from "master" cell to "slave" cells.
A/C:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: