-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Is --noaur assumed for --downloadonly ? #15
Comments
Yes, I think, since I can't download packages from AUR. What behavior do you want? |
I'm okay if noaur is assumed in this case. pacaur used to support -Sw. One note, pakku tab completes aur package for -Sw suggesting that it supports aur |
When pacman receives -Sw it downloads a package and leaves it on the pkg
cache. Maybe pakku could build and cache the package skipping the install
step
El jue., 7 jun. 2018 16:49, BurhanDanger <notifications@github.com>
escribió:
… I'm okay if noaur is assumed in this case. pacaur used to support -Sw.
One note, pakku tab completes aur package for -Sw suggesting that it
supports aur
—
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#15 (comment)>, or mute
the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ARxPWJx5BeXYLRUbEbV4w--17BtTpICmks5t6T10gaJpZM4UbW5o>
.
|
I think implementing it as pacaur does is a good idea. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: