Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Font does not work in XeTeX #21

Open
blmayer opened this issue Jan 11, 2016 · 5 comments
Open

Font does not work in XeTeX #21

blmayer opened this issue Jan 11, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@blmayer
Copy link

blmayer commented Jan 11, 2016

Great work, gorgeous fonts, and specially, thanks for including the long s glyph, its ligatures and ct and st ligatures, no one ever did so. But one problem: Including especial characters or numbers on the font name makes it not work in XeTeX, so could you remove it please? It will be great to see "Open Baskerville" only on the font name. Thanks.

@codingisacopingstrategy
Copy link
Collaborator

Hello,

Thanks for your report!
But isn’t that a XeTeX bug? Did you file a bug with them already?

Cheers,

Eric

@blmayer
Copy link
Author

blmayer commented Jan 11, 2016

I didn't filed a big yet just searched throughout mailing lists and forums. They say it's a limitation, because TeX interprets the period like the start of the font extension, thus it's not expected to find versions, as they usually have periods, in the font name.

@rwmpelstilzchen
Copy link

I would like to add there is no reason to include version number as a part of the font’s name. Almost nobody does that, and for a good reason. Version is indicated in the font metadata anyway.

@bleemayer:

[…] thanks for including the long s glyph, its ligatures and ct and st ligatures, no one ever did so.

You might want to know Junicode supports all kinds of ligatures and OpenType features (see this specimen) and IMHO it looks great.

@blmayer
Copy link
Author

blmayer commented Jan 12, 2016

You're right @rwmpelstilzchen! Thanks for the suggestion, will be taking a look at it.

@Lilmama93
Copy link

Did you take a look at it?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants