Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Snyk] Upgrade com.fasterxml.jackson.module:jackson-module-kotlin from 2.17.1 to 2.17.2 #64

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 2, 2024

Conversation

hayco
Copy link
Contributor

@hayco hayco commented Aug 4, 2024

snyk-top-banner

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade com.fasterxml.jackson.module:jackson-module-kotlin from 2.17.1 to 2.17.2.

ℹ️ Keep your dependencies up-to-date. This makes it easier to fix existing vulnerabilities and to more quickly identify and fix newly disclosed vulnerabilities when they affect your project.


  • The recommended version is 1 version ahead of your current version.

  • The recommended version was released on a month ago.


Important

  • Check the changes in this PR to ensure they won't cause issues with your project.
  • This PR was automatically created by Snyk using the credentials of a real user.

Note: You are seeing this because you or someone else with access to this repository has authorized Snyk to open upgrade PRs.

For more information:

…2.17.1 to 2.17.2

Snyk has created this PR to upgrade com.fasterxml.jackson.module:jackson-module-kotlin from 2.17.1 to 2.17.2.

See this package in maven:
com.fasterxml.jackson.module:jackson-module-kotlin

See this project in Snyk:
https://app.snyk.io/org/jonghuc/project/55686653-3375-404d-8891-c195ee7f8c3a?utm_source=github&utm_medium=referral&page=upgrade-pr
@hayco hayco merged commit f91cd81 into main Sep 2, 2024
2 checks passed
@hayco hayco deleted the snyk-upgrade-4c5238316cf2be3b5da2c657ed1515ae branch September 2, 2024 11:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants