title |
---|
Getting Started |
Stuck?
- See the Frequently asked questions
- Ask in
#javascript
on http://slack.bazel.build - Check for known issues
- Pay for support, provided by https://aspect.dev.
From the release you wish to use:
https://github.com/aspect-build/rules_js/releases
copy the WORKSPACE snippet into your WORKSPACE
file.
Bazel's BUILD
or BUILD.bazel
files are used to declare the dependency graph of your code.
They describe the source files and their dependencies, and declare entry points for programs or tests.
However, they don't say how to build the code, that's the job of Bazel rules.
Because BUILD
files typically declare a finer-grained dependency graph than package.json
files, Bazel can be smarter about what to fetch or invalidate for a given build.
For example, Bazel might only need to fetch a single npm package for a simple build,
where you might experience other tools installing the entire package.json
file.
Authoring BUILD files by hand is a chore, so we recommend using the
configure
command from
Aspect CLI to automate 80% of this work.
Other recommendations:
- Put common flags in your
.bazelrc
file. - Use Renovate to keep your Bazel dependencies up-to-date.
rules_js depends on rules_nodejs version 5.0 or greater.
Installation is included in the WORKSPACE
snippet you pasted from the Installation instructions above.
API docs:
- Choosing the version of Node.js: https://bazelbuild.github.io/rules_nodejs/install.html
- Rules API: https://bazelbuild.github.io/rules_nodejs/Core.html
- The Node.js toolchain: https://bazelbuild.github.io/rules_nodejs/Toolchains.html
rules_js accesses npm packages using pnpm.
pnpm's "virtual store" of packages aligns with Bazel's "external repositories",
and the pnpm "linker" which creates the node_modules
tree has semantics we can reproduce with Bazel actions.
If your code works with pnpm, then you should expect it works under Bazel as well. This means that if your issue can be reproduced outside of Bazel, using a reproduction with only pnpm, then we ask that you fix the issue there, and will close such issues filed on rules_js.
The typical usage is to import an entire pnpm-lock.yaml
file.
Create such a file if you don't have one. You could install pnpm on your machine, or use npx
to run it.
We recommend this command, which creates a lockfile with minimal installation needed,
using the identical version of pnpm that Bazel is configured with:
$ bazel run -- @pnpm//:pnpm --dir $PWD install --lockfile-only
Instead of checking in a pnpm-lock.yaml
file, you could use a package-lock.json
or yarn.lock
file with the npm_package_lock
/yarn_lock
attributes of npm_translate_lock
.
If you do, rules_js will run pnpm import
to generate a pnpm-lock.yaml
file on-the-fly.
This is only recommended during migrations; see the notes about these attributes in the migration guide.
Next, you'll typically use npm_translate_lock
to translate the lock file to Starlark, which Bazel extensions understand.
The WORKSPACE
snippet you pasted above already contains this code.
After npm_translate_lock
, you have two choices:
load
from the generatedrepositories.bzl
file inWORKSPACE
, like theWORKSPACE
snippet does. This will cause every Bazel execution to evaluate thenpm_translate_lock
, making it "eager". The execution is fast and only invalidated when thepnpm-lock.yaml
file changes, so we recommend this approach.- Check the generated
repositories.bzl
file into your version control, andload
it from there. This fixes the "eager" execution, however it means you need some way to ensure the file stays up-to-date as thepnpm-lock.yaml
file changes. This approach can be useful for bazel rules which want to hide their transitive dependencies from users. See bazelbuild/rules_python#608 for a similar discussion about rules_pythonpip_parse
which is similar.
Technically, we run a port of pnpm rather than pnpm itself. Here are some design details:
- You don't need to install pnpm on your machine to build and test with Bazel.
- We re-use pnpm's resolver, by consuming the
pnpm-lock.yaml
file it produces. - We use Bazel's downloader API to fetch package tarballs and extract them to external repositories. To modify the URLs Bazel uses to download packages (for example, to fetch from Artifactory), read https://blog.aspect.dev/configuring-bazels-downloader.
- We re-use the
@pnpm/lifecycle
package to perform postinstall steps. (These run as cacheable Bazel actions.) - Finally, you link the
node_modules
tree by adding anpm_link_package
ornpm_link_all_packages
in yourBUILD
file, which populates a tree underbazel-bin/[path/to/package]/node_modules
.
After importing the lockfile, you should be able to fetch the resulting repository.
Assuming your npm_translate_lock
was named npm
, you can run:
$ bazel fetch @npm//...
Next, we'll need to "link" these npm packages into a node_modules
tree.
If you use pnpm workspaces, the node_modules
tree contains first-party packages from your
monorepo as well as third-party packages from npm.
Bazel doesn't use the
node_modules
installed in your source tree. You do not need to runpnpm install
before running Bazel commands. Changes you make to files undernode_modules
in your source tree are not reflected in Bazel results.
Typically, you'll just link all npm packages into the Bazel package containing the package.json
file.
If you use pnpm workspaces, you will do this for each npm package in your monorepo.
In BUILD.bazel
:
load("@npm//:defs.bzl", "npm_link_all_packages")
npm_link_all_packages()
You can see this working by running bazel build ...
, then look in the bazel-bin
folder.
You'll see something like this:
# the virtual store
bazel-bin/node_modules/.aspect_rules_js
# symlink into the virtual store
bazel-bin/node_modules/some_pkg
# If you used pnpm workspaces:
bazel-bin/packages/some_pkg/node_modules/some_dep
API docs:
- npm_import: Import all packages from the pnpm-lock.yaml file, or import individual packages.
- npm_link_package: Link npm package(s) into the
bazel-bin/[path/to/package]/node_modules
tree so that the Node.js runtime can resolve them.
rules_js provides some primitives to work with JS files. However, since JavaScript is an interpreted language, simple use cases don't require performing build steps like compilation.
The Node.js module resolution algorithm requires that all files (sources, generated code, and dependencies) be co-located in a common filesystem tree, which is the working directory for the Node.js interpreter.
As described earlier, the dependencies were linked into bazel-bin/[path/to/package]/node_modules
,
and Bazel places generated files in bazel-bin/[path/to/package]
. This leaves source files to be
copied to this location.
Copying sources to the bazel-bin folder is surprising if you come from a Bazel background, as other Bazel rulesets accomodate tooling by teaching it to mix a source folder and an output folder. This is not possible with Node.js, without breaking compatibility of many tools.
Our custom rules will take care of copying their sources to the bazel-bin
output folder automatically.
However this only works when those sources are under the same BUILD
file as the target that does
the copying. If you have a source file in another BUILD
file, you'll need to explicitly copy that
with a rule like copy_to_bin
.
API docs:
- js_library: Declare a logical grouping of JS files and their dependencies.
- js_binary: Declare a Node.js executable program.
- js_run_binary: Run a Node.js executable program as the "tool" in a Bazel action that produces outputs, similar to
genrule
.
rules_js automatically mirrors the bin
field from the package.json
file of your npm dependencies
to a Starlark API you can load from in your BUILD file or macro.
For example, if you depend on the typescript
npm package in your root package.json
, the tsc
bin entry can be accessed in a BUILD
:
load("@npm//:typescript/package_json.bzl", typescript_bin = "bin")
typescript_bin.tsc(
name = "compile",
srcs = [
"fs.ts",
"tsconfig.json",
"//:node_modules/@types/node",
],
outs = ["fs.js"],
chdir = package_name(),
args = ["-p", "tsconfig.json"],
)
If you depend on the typescript
npm package from a nested package.json
such as myapp/package.json
, the bin entry would be loaded from the nested package:
load("@npm//myapp:typescript/package_json.bzl", typescript_bin = "bin")
Each bin exposes three rules, one for each Bazel command ("verb"): build, test and run - each aligning with the corresponding js_run_binary, js_test and js_binary rule APIs.
For example:
Rule | Underlying Rule | Invoked with | To |
---|---|---|---|
foo |
js_run_binary |
bazel build |
produce outputs |
foo_binary |
js_binary |
bazel run |
side-effects |
foo_test |
js_test |
bazel test |
assert exit 0 |
Note: this doesn't cause an eager fetch! Bazel doesn't download the typescript package when loading this file, so you can safely write this even in a BUILD.bazel file that includes unrelated rules.
To inspect what's in the @npm
workspace, start with a bazel query
like the following:
$ bazel query @npm//... --output=location | grep bzl_library
/shared/cache/bazel/user_base/581b2ac03dd093577e8a6ba6b6509be5/external/npm/BUILD.bazel:5095:12: bzl_library rule @npm//:typescript_bzl_library
/shared/cache/bazel/user_base/581b2ac03dd093577e8a6ba6b6509be5/external/npm/examples/macro/BUILD.bazel:4:12: bzl_library rule @npm//examples/macro:mocha_bzl_library
This shows locations on disk where the npm packages can be loaded.
To see the definition of one of these targets, you can run another bazel query
:
$ bazel query --output=build @npm//:typescript_bzl_library
# /shared/cache/bazel/user_base/581b2ac03dd093577e8a6ba6b6509be5/external/npm/BUILD.bazel:5095:12
bzl_library(
name = "typescript_bzl_library",
visibility = ["//visibility:public"],
srcs = ["@npm//:typescript/package_json.bzl"],
deps = ["@npm__typescript__4.9.5//:typescript_bzl_library"],
)
This shows us that the label @npm//:typescript/package_json.bzl
can be used to load the "bin" symbol. You can also follow the location on disk to find that file.
Bazel macros are a critical part of making your BUILD files more maintainable. Make sure to follow the Style Guide when writing a macro, since some anti-patterns can make your BUILD files difficult to change in the future.
Like Custom Rules, Macros require you to use the Starlark language, but writing a macro is much easier since it merely composes existing rules together, rather than writing any from scratch. We believe that most use cases can be accomplished with macros, and discourage you learning how to write custom rules unless you're really interested in investing time becoming a Bazel expert.
You can think of Macros as a way to create your own Build System, by piping the existing tools together (like a unix pipeline that composes command-line utilities by piping their stdout/stdin).
As an example, we could write a wrapper for the typescript_bin.tsc
rule above.
In tsc.bzl
we could write:
load("@npm//:typescript/package_json.bzl", typescript_bin = "bin")
def tsc(name, args = ["-p", "tsconfig.json"], **kwargs):
typescript_bin.tsc(
name = name,
args = args,
# Always run tsc with the working directory in the project folder
chdir = native.package_name(),
**kwargs
)
so that the users BUILD
file can omit some of the syntax and default settings:
load(":tsc.bzl", "tsc")
tsc(
name = "two",
srcs = [
"tsconfig.json",
"two.ts",
"//:node_modules/@types/node",
"//examples/js_library/one",
],
outs = [
"two.js",
],
)
If macros are not sufficient to express your Bazel logic, you can use a custom rule instead. Aspect has written a number of these based on rules_js, such as:
- rules_ts - Bazel rules for the
tsc
compiler from http://typescriptlang.org - rules_swc - Bazel rules for the swc toolchain https://swc.rs/
- rules_jest - Bazel rules to run tests using https://jestjs.io
- rules_esbuild - Bazel rules for https://esbuild.github.io/ JS bundler
- rules_webpack - Bazel rules for webpack bundler https://webpack.js.org/
- rules_terser - Bazel rules for https://terser.org/ - a JavaScript minifier
- rules_rollup - Bazel rules for https://rollupjs.org/ - a JavaScript bundler
- rules_deno - Bazel rules for Deno http://deno.land
You can also write your own custom rule, though this is an advanced topic and not covered in this documentation.
You can use stardoc to produce API documentation from Starlark code.
We recommend producing Markdown output, and checking those .md
files into your source repository.
This makes it easy to browse them at the same revision as the sources.
You'll need to create bzl_library
targets for your Starlark files.
This is a good practice as it lets users of your code generate their own documentation as well.
In addition, Aspect's bazel-lib provides some helpers that make it easy to run stardoc and check that it's always up-to-date.
Continuing our example, where we wrote a macro in tsc.bzl
, we'd write this to document it, in BUILD
:
load("@aspect_bazel_lib//lib:docs.bzl", "stardoc_with_diff_test", "update_docs")
load("@bazel_skylib//:bzl_library.bzl", "bzl_library")
bzl_library(
name = "tsc",
srcs = ["tsc.bzl"],
deps = [
# this is a bzl_library target, exposing the package_json.bzl file we depend on
"@npm//:typescript",
],
)
stardoc_with_diff_test(
name = "tsc-docs",
bzl_library_target = ":tsc",
)
update_docs(name = "docs")
This setup appears in examples/macro.
You can declare an npm package from sources in your repository.
The package can be exported for usage outside the repository, to a registry like npm or Artifactory. Or, you can use it locally within a monorepo using pnpm workspaces.
Note: we don't yet document how to publish. For now, build the
npm_package
target withbazel build
, thencd
into thebazel-out
folder where the package was created, and runnpm pack
ornpm publish
.
API docs:
Add the options in the "Support for debugging Node.js tests" section from https://github.com/aspect-build/rules_js/blob/main/.bazelrc.common to your project’s .bazelrc file to add the --config=debug
settings for debugging Node.js programs.
In this repository, for example, we can debug the //examples/js_binary:test_test
js_test
target with,
$ bazel run //examples/js_binary:test_test --config=debug
Starting local Bazel server and connecting to it...
INFO: Analyzed target //examples/js_binary:test_test (65 packages loaded, 1023 targets configured).
INFO: Found 1 target...
Target //examples/js_binary:test_test up-to-date:
bazel-bin/examples/js_binary/test_test.sh
INFO: Elapsed time: 6.774s, Critical Path: 0.08s
INFO: 6 processes: 4 internal, 2 local.
INFO: Build completed successfully, 6 total actions
INFO: Build completed successfully, 6 total actions
exec ${PAGER:-/usr/bin/less} "$0" || exit 1
Executing tests from //examples/js_binary:test_test
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Debugger listening on ws://127.0.0.1:9229/76b4bb42-7d4e-41f6-a7fe-92b57db356ad
For help, see: https://nodejs.org/en/docs/inspector
At this point you can connect to this Node.js debugging session with a debugging tool.
To use Chrome, open a new tab and enter the URL chrome://inspect/
. You should see the
session listed there and you can connect to it and debug in Chrome DevTools.
See Debugging Node.js with Chrome DevTools
to understand the basics of using the DevTools with Node.
In this repository, we have added a VSCode the .vscode/launch.json
configuration file
so you can launch into a debugging session directly from the
Run & Debug window.