New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

add more elaborate and comprehensive tests for bibliographic typesetting #72

Open

timmli opened this issue Jan 1, 2018 · 2 comments

Assignees

Collaborator

timmli commented Jan 1, 2018 •

edited

Loading

complete, abstract examples for each of the supported types

Glottotopia self-assigned this

Contributor

Glottotopia commented Apr 9, 2018

this is started in df39b26. @electronic seems to be a problematic type

Collaborator Author

timmli commented May 9, 2018

@Glottotopia Maybe this table should be covered in the tests: https://github.com/langsci/bib-db#formatting-rules

Glottotopia assigned kopeckyf

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment