You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I was thinking of adding a trait like FrequentistTest:
traitFrequentistTest{fnp_value(&self) -> f64;}
It would automatically support something like is_significant(a: f64). However, mosts tests so far (and probably most, if not all tests in the future) will produce an estimate that lies somewhere on a distribution. At that point it might make more sense to have the trait require (f64, T) where T: ContinuousCDF and have the trait deal with alternative hypotheses (#1).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I was thinking of adding a trait like
FrequentistTest
:It would automatically support something like
is_significant(a: f64)
. However, mosts tests so far (and probably most, if not all tests in the future) will produce an estimate that lies somewhere on a distribution. At that point it might make more sense to have the trait require(f64, T) where T: ContinuousCDF
and have the trait deal with alternative hypotheses (#1).The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: