Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature/cid 3089/enchance admin logging #31

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Oct 31, 2024

Conversation

geoandri
Copy link
Contributor

🛠 Changes made

Enhancing administrative logging for better debugging and overview of agent's operation.

✨ Type of change

Please delete the options that are not relevant.

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)

🧪 How Has This Been Tested?

Adapted existing test to cover the new added functionality

🏎 Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (README.md)
  • My commit message clearly reflects the changes made
  • Assigned the appropriate labels (version, PR type, etc.)

@geoandri geoandri requested a review from a team as a code owner October 29, 2024 13:55
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Oct 29, 2024

LeanIX GitHub Agent Code Coverage

File Coverage [81.28%] 🍏
GitHubScanningService.kt 94.81% 🍏
GitHubAuthenticationService.kt 78.69% 🍏
SyncLogDto.kt 65.26% 🍏
SyncLogService.kt 31.37%
Total Project Coverage 70.68% 🍏

@geoandri geoandri added the enhancement New feature or request label Oct 29, 2024
@henriq-amaral-leanix
Copy link
Contributor

Were you able to test the messages point to the backend?

@geoandri
Copy link
Contributor Author

Were you able to test the messages point to the backend?

I re-used the existing functions for this purpose, should I manually test it?

@henriq-amaral-leanix
Copy link
Contributor

Were you able to test the messages point to the backend?

I re-used the existing functions for this purpose, should I manually test it?

I recommend, if you need help to run the agent locally. I can help you.

@geoandri geoandri merged commit be85526 into main Oct 31, 2024
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants