Is it a good idea to run a watchtower backed by neutrino? #6196
-
Having a watchtower in a different geographical location to your lnd node have obvious benefits, and this can be done in a cost-effective manner using VPS services. However, most VPS service do not include enough storage space to enable running a full bitcoin node on them. Using Neutrino-backed lnd as watchtower seems like a solution, as you don't need the huge storage requirements to store the entire blockchain. Is there any fatal drawbacks to this approach? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 3 comments 2 replies
-
I'm asking the same and if neutrino isn't good for that what about a pruned bitcoind? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Since a watchtower mostly looks at new, incoming blocks, I'd actually suggest using a pruned |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Hi, i think the "p2p port" is the 8333 by default. right ? Thanks |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Since a watchtower mostly looks at new, incoming blocks, I'd actually suggest using a pruned
bitcoind
node. The slight disadvantage of a Neutrino node vs. a prunedbitcoind
node is that Neutrino doesn't look at the mempool. But because AFAIK a watchtower only reacts after a breach TX was confirmed, this shouldn't make a big difference.So Neutrino should work well too. Just make sure you specify multiple peers or your own node that reliably serves you blocks. If you end up not getting new blocks because your Neutrino client isn't served anymore, your watchtower can't watch the chain.