Negative Transaction Fee
#8480
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
|
You mean "inbound fees"? |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
-
|
No, I mean paying someone for using the Channel. Giving sats for routing instead of charging a fee. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
|
Ah, right. So lightning/bolts#1022. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
I have some channels that don't route even with zero fees. My partner has astronomically high fees. Profitable rebalancing is therefore not possible. What if you could pay others to use the channel? (neative fees)
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions