-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 79
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[venice-server] Dropping unassigned partitions #1196
Draft
kristyelee
wants to merge
16
commits into
linkedin:main
Choose a base branch
from
kristyelee:kristy_lee/650
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+149
−4
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cc1d7ff
Initial commit
kristyelee c4b6682
First test for removal of partition
kristyelee 8093581
Write function to remove unsubscribed (unassigned) partitions
kristyelee c8ebe2d
Merge branch 'linkedin:main' into kristy_lee/650
kristyelee 3eaeafb
Write test function to test removing unsubscribed (unassigned) partit…
kristyelee 0e24cec
Update StorageEngine intializer in VeniceServer
kristyelee ff6a165
StorageService arguments set to initial state in VeniceServer
kristyelee 01ca67f
Standardize code
kristyelee fd14574
Standardize code
kristyelee 56e7711
Update ideal state
kristyelee 04c4e9e
Update initialized StorageService object [with revised import]
kristyelee e09f7bf
[Placeholder]
kristyelee 6c50513
Updated StorageService constructor and initializer with functionToChe…
kristyelee 06dd6c2
Updated StorageService constructor and initializer [modified]
kristyelee 53d177c
Revised StorageService constructor
kristyelee d8bad05
Merge branch 'linkedin:main' into kristy_lee/650
kristyelee File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can we create an additional constructor that doesn't have
checkWhetherStoragePartitionsShouldBeKeptOrNot
, so if users don't want to use this, they wouldn't have to pass in a functional interface that does nothing.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, that sounds correct;
checkWhetherStoragePartitionsShouldBeKeptOrNot
is mainly being written in VeniceServer.