Update check-alpha.qmd

formatting bullet points

tutorial_pages/check-alpha.qmd

@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@ Are those deviations meaningful? Significant?
 ***
 
 **YOUR TURN:**  
-Plot the output of the function simT with `nrep=1000` and `n=10`
+Plot the output of the function simT with `nrep=1000` and `n=10`  
 Plot the output of the function simT with `nrep=1000` and `n=100`
 
 ***
@@ -60,6 +60,7 @@ It is important to note that, although `alpha = 0.05` is commonly used, this is
 Altough it isn't necessary to check that a statistical analysis as simple as a t-test does not yield more than 5% of false-positive results, when the structure of the data is complex and analysed with more advanced models (e.g. when explanatory variables are mathematically linked to each other, and are combined in a mixed-effect models), this may allow to compare different modelling approach and select the one that does not produce more than 5% false positive results.  
 
 Such complex example where simulations is the only viable approach to construct a statistical model that does not lead to spurious effects can be found in this paper:
+
 * Ihle, Malika, et al (2020). "Measuring Up to Reality: Null Models and Analysis Simulations to Study Parental Coordination Over Provisioning Offspring." Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution. <a href="https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00142" target="_blank">https://doi.org/10.3389/fevo.2019.00142</a>
 
 ***