-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
/
appendix1.tex
38 lines (33 loc) · 2.8 KB
/
appendix1.tex
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
\chapter{Time Dependent Collisional Radiative Model} \label{app:colrad}
The collisions that the fast-neutral experiences as it travels through a plasma changes the distribution of its energy level population. The collisional radiative model assumes that the populations of excited states with the same principal quantum number $n$ are distributed according to a Boltzmann distribution. This allows us to only consider transitions between different energy levels. However, this assumption has been shown\cite{marchuk2012} to break down when the electron density is less than $10^{14}\, cm^{-3}$. In this regime the following collisional radiative model can overestimate the D-$\alpha$ emission by about $20\mbox{-}25\%$. This remains a source of error in our model.
The types of collisions that the model considers are as follows
\begin{itemize}
\item Spontaneous transitions: $A_{m \rightarrow n} / A_{n \rightarrow m}$
\item Electron/Ion/Impurity-impact excitation/de-excitation: $q^{e|i|Z}_{m \rightarrow n} / q^{e|i|Z}_{n \rightarrow m}$
\item Electron/Ion/Impurity-impact ionization: $I^{e|i|Z}_n$
\item Charge exchange with ions/impurities: $X^{i|Z}_n$
\end{itemize}
With the exception of the spontaneous transitions which has units of $s^{-1}$, the above rate coefficients have units of $cm^3/s$ and are calculated by averaging the respective collisional cross sections with a Maxwellian of the relevant species.
The quasi-static equilibrium population flux of the $n^{th}$ energy level of a neutral atom, $f_n$, can be described by the following time dependent differential equation
\begin{align*}
\frac{df_n}{dt} = &- \left ( \sum_{k=i,Z} f_n d_k X^k_n + \sum_{k=e,i,Z} f_n d_k I^k_n \right )\\
& + \sum_{m>n} \left (f_m A_{m \rightarrow n} + \sum_{k=e,i,Z} (f_m d_k q^k_{m \rightarrow n} - f_n d_k q^k_{n \rightarrow m}) \right ) \\
& + \sum_{n>m} \left (-f_n A_{n \rightarrow m} + \sum_{k=e,i,Z} (f_m d_k q^k_{m \rightarrow n} - f_n d_k q^k_{n \rightarrow m}) \right )
\end{align*}
where the $d_k$ are the respective target densities.
Rearranging terms and letting $q^k_{n \rightarrow m}$ represent excitation/de-excitation depending on the order of the indices yields the following equation,
\begin{equation}
\frac{df_n}{dt} = C_{nn} f_n + \sum_{m \ne n} C_{nm} f_m,
\end{equation}
where
\begin{equation}
C_{nn} = - \left [ \sum_{k=i,Z} d_k X^k_n + \sum_{k=e,i,Z} d_k I^k_n + \sum_{m \ne n} \left ( A_{n \rightarrow m} + \sum_{k=e,i,Z} d_k q^k_{n \rightarrow m} \right ) \right ]
\end{equation}
and
\begin{equation}
C_{nm} = A_{m \rightarrow n} + \sum_{k=e,i,Z} d_k q^k_{m \rightarrow n}.
\end{equation}
The system of differential equations can be compactly represented as a matrix multiplication.
\begin{equation}\label{eq:el_diffeq}
\frac{d \mathbf{f}}{dt} = \mathbf{C} \cdot \mathbf{f}
\end{equation}