LARGE LOSS observed in 2-D Navier-Stokes equation #1810
Unanswered
chrisxbchen
asked this question in
Q&A
Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
It seems that the IC from PINN is not correct. Try a very small time internal such as [0, 0.1]; if IC is still not correct, then the code of IC could be wrong. You need to use |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Do you have a way to solve this problem? I also encountered a situation with a big loss. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
Hi fellows,
The first issue is about the Adam iteration numbers. We've tried 10k, 20k, and 30k Adam iterations and found that
(1) large number of iterations doesn't help with reducing the loss and
(2) LBFGS doesn't help with further reducing the loss.
The second issue is that the predicted initial velocity looks very different from the exact solution. We believe a good prediction won't have such a big difference. Hereunder are the pictures of the exact initial velocity field and the predicted result from the model. The exact one has several vortices throughout the domain, but the model prediction has no vortices.
The code is attached in which only a small training set and a small number of iterations are used, but the problem would be roughly the same if a large training set and more iterations are utilized.
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions