Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

hash/thinkpad8xx.xml: Add AIX 4 (not working) #12832

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 9, 2024
Merged

Conversation

clawgrip
Copy link
Contributor

New software list items marked not working

thinkpad8xx.xml: IBM AIX 4 [ClawGrip]

Also added some metadata to AIX 4.1.5

New software list items marked not working
------------------------------------------
thinkpad8xx.xml: IBM AIX 4 [ClawGrip]

Also added some metadata to AIX 4.1.5
Copy link
Member

@cuavas cuavas left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Can you please not remove the space before the /> in self-closing XML tags?

@clawgrip
Copy link
Contributor Author

clawgrip commented Oct 7, 2024

Can you please not remove the space before the /> in self-closing XML tags?

Done, thanks!

Comment on lines 17 to 25
<feature name="form" value="LK2T0241" /> <!-- FORM on internal .Version -->
<feature name="date" value="970227070036" /> <!-- September 29, 2000, on internal .Version -->
<diskarea name="cdrom">
<disk name="aix_4.1.5_disc_01" sha1="4c49c8190e33c2c7f13a74d7332d384edd6b3042" />
</diskarea>
</part>
<part name="cdrom2" interface="cdrom">
<feature name="part_id" value="AIX 4 Volume 2 of 2" />
<feature name="date" value="970331130110" /> <!-- September 30, 2000, on internal .Version -->
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Are you sure these are supposed to be UNIX timestamps? They don’t make sense interpreted that way. Wouldn’t it be more likely to be 1997-03-31T13:01:10?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, absolutely. I've fixed it.

Comment on lines 39 to 42
<feature name="part_number" value="40H1045" /> <!-- PN on CD cover -->
<feature name="part" value="11H6464" /> <!-- PART on internal .Version -->
<feature name="form" value="Power Desktop" /> <!-- FORM on internal .Version -->
<feature name="date" value="951031114200" /> <!-- February 20, 2000 -->
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same with this – the date doesn’t make sense as a UNIX timestamp, but 1995-10-31T11:42:00 makes sense as a build date.

@cuavas cuavas merged commit 2443fb6 into mamedev:master Oct 9, 2024
3 checks passed
@clawgrip clawgrip deleted the patch-10 branch October 9, 2024 15:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants