ignore model_computed_fields

[spacemanspiff2007]

Changed like suggested in #201

[tasansal]

@mansenfranzen this is a pretty simple fix, can this be please merged?

[tasansal]

@spacemanspiff2007

Looks like settings_customise_sources class method of PydanticSettings is also having a similar issue, should be ignore but it shows up in documentation.

Would you like to add it to this PR as well, or should I make another one?

[spacemanspiff2007]

It's no problem - I've added it

[spacemanspiff2007]

Test fails unrelated I guess

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 95.85%. Comparing base (1d14f12) to head (29fa653).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #202   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   95.84%   95.85%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines        1036     1038    +2     
=======================================
+ Hits          993      995    +2     
  Misses         43       43           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[mansenfranzen]

Yes, test fails are unrelated and have been addressed in #190.

[mansenfranzen]

I added a test case for settings_customise_sources and moved the the member exclusion from the Model documenter into the Settings documenter class.

[mansenfranzen]

@all-contributors please add @tasansal for idea

[allcontributors]

@mansenfranzen

I've put up a pull request to add @tasansal! 🎉