-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 126
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Release notes for 6.11 #38129
Release notes for 6.11 #38129
Conversation
Ran release_editor.py script and commited the resulting changes
There is a |
This should be pointing into |
Also |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lots of minor things in this review. Make sure to go to the files tab and select 'Add suggestion to batch' for the one you want to accept, rather than making a commit for each.
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Haigh <35813666+jhaigh0@users.noreply.github.com> Co-authored-by: RichardWaiteSTFC <55979119+RichardWaiteSTFC@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jonathan Haigh <35813666+jhaigh0@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
some more small changes and a question for @jclarkeSTFC
The effect is that there is no longer negative bin edges unless there is actually a negative time-of-flight in the data. | ||
- Isotope densities have been updated, see https://pypi.org/project/periodictable/1.6.1/#history for notes about the updates from NIST. | ||
- Algorithm `IntegratePeaks1DProfile <algm-IntegratePeaks1DProfile-v1>` no longer references `numpy.distutils`, since as of NumPy 1.23.0 it is deprecated. | ||
- All sample times are now allowed to be before 01/01/1991. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jclarkeSTFC I think the rewording of this has broken the meaning of the fix. Can you suggest something that describes the fix?
Although it's not directly applicable for users, it's a noteworthy change for developers.
I'm happy for this to be merged pending one change to this line, which is a bit confusing: |
Co-authored-by: James Clarke <139879523+jclarkeSTFC@users.noreply.github.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All requested changes have been implemented and docs build is fine.
Description of work
This PR contains the bulk of the edited release notes
Summary of work
Went over release notes and edited them so they fit the same format.
Further detail of work
To test:
Read over release notes to correct any typos.
Build and open release notes to check for formatting issues.
Reviewer
Please comment on the points listed below (full description).
Your comments will be used as part of the gatekeeper process, so please comment clearly on what you have checked during your review. If changes are made to the PR during the review process then your final comment will be the most important for gatekeepers. In this comment you should make it clear why any earlier review is still valid, or confirm that all requested changes have been addressed.
Code Review
Functional Tests
Does everything look good? Mark the review as Approve. A member of
@mantidproject/gatekeepers
will take care of it.Gatekeeper
If you need to request changes to a PR then please add a comment and set the review status to "Request changes". This will stop the PR from showing up in the list for other gatekeepers.