Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
105 lines (87 loc) · 4.15 KB

meet-002_2023-09-21.md

File metadata and controls

105 lines (87 loc) · 4.15 KB

Phase Field Schema WG: Meet 1

hackmd-github-sync-badge

Meeting agenda, notes and actions for 2023-09-21.

Organizer : Daniel Wheeler, NIST

Attendees : - Daniel Wheeler, NIST

  • Zachary Trautt, NIST
  • Stephen DeWitt (he/him), ORNL
  • Trevor Keller (they/them), NIST; uses FEniCS
  • Kasra Momeni; uses COMSOL

Links

Agenda

  1. Intros

  2. Motivation

    • Background materials / links
  3. Procedural issues

    • How frequently to meet?
      • 2 weeks?
      • monthly?
    • Which platform?
      • Google Meet
      • Snail mail
    • 1 hour format for meetings
    • Keep things in GitHub repo (discussion etc)
    • Whenisgood poll for meetings?
  4. What's a MaRDA WG? Olga Wodo / Zach

  5. Current state of PFHub schema: Trevor

  6. Proposal document revisions

    • Goals / outcomes / impacts / deliverables revisions
    • Short term, medium term, long term
  7. Action items for next meeting

    1. More participants? [DW]
      • One extra from commercial code?
        • OpenPhase - Martin Tegeler
        • COMSOL - Alex Guo
        • Pace3D - Britta Nestler, KIT
        • MDF individual
    2. Determine some viable use cases [Everyone]
      • AI use case
      • PFHub benchmark use case
      • Complement to a published paper to better understand it
      • Translation between input files for different codes/frameworks
      • Data publication as a first-class research output
      • Apples-to-apples comparisons between codes (for correctness or performance)
    3. Contribute ideas to schema [DW, Kasra]
      • What fields are required?
      • Categorize things (software frameworks, numerical methods and problem specs)
      • List of existing relevant simulation schemas (e.g. Sumatra)
      • Are there any other simulation schemas?

Notes

  1. What relevance does a metadata file have for a dataset that's too large to redistribute?

Action Items / Follow Up

Current Work Plan (feel free to comment below items)

  1. Generate and finalize an initial schema:

    • Use the existing PFHub LinkML repository as a basis for generating the schema.
    • Determine use cases (how would other researcher use phase field data).
    • Finalize a schema over first few months of WG
  2. Implement web tool, templates or command line to generate schema files metadata records

    • Develop a web tool for generating schema files metadata records similar to codemeta.json
    • Create prefilled examples of the YAML / JSON files.
    • Co-opt existing or use new command line tool to query repositories, ask questions, populate templates and push entries to Zenodo or similar service.
    • A possible long term goal would be a phase field registry similar to PFHub.
  3. Develop working examples

    • An example using an existing PFHub benchmark result and integrated into the PFHub registry.
    • An example using a study of numerical convergence using a series of simulations at varying discretizations.
    • An example phase field schema and associated data published in conjunction with a phase field publication.
  4. Approach wider phase field community for feedback

    • Present examples and tools at CHiMaD phase field workshops
    • Present same at the MaRDA meeting
    • Present at larger conference.
    • Publication describing schema and case study examples.