-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 120
estimating Bayesian MSM very slow #1613
Comments
Hi H-EKE, I was struggling with the same issue. According to #1590, 1576, 1582 and especially 1553. This is a frequently encountered error which will probably be resolved out-of-the-box in future releases. For now 1553 its solution should resolve the problem. This means that you will have to add the n_jobs=1 argument to:
The above lines of code belong to the notebook 00-pentapeptide-showcase.ipnyb.
I hope this also resolves your issue. All credit is due to the contributors of the previous topics. |
UPDATE An even more elegant solution would be to follow yuxuanzhuang his solution from #1590. According to this post you should update estimator.py at line number 346. estimator.py is located in the _base directory of your pyemma directory. Hereby: I have tested this change with multiple notebooks and so far it seems to work excellent. For pyemma.msm.its() instances; the n_jobs=1 workaround frequently has got to be used. Using only the n_jobs=1 workaround still gave me freezing issues in notebook 03 - MSM estimation and validation. Kind regards, and all credit is due to the contributors of the previous topics. |
Dear @D16ERG Thank you so much for your help and tips! |
Glad to help! I know how frustrating unresolved issues can be if such steps are part of a larger project! Please do note however that there still seems to be an unresolved issue in notebook 07. These issues are described in #1604 and #1610. Update: |
Hi,
Im trying to follow the tutorial 6 (http://emma-project.org/latest/tutorials/notebooks/06-expectations-and-observables.html#Dynamic/kinetic-experimental-observables) to calculate the Trp-flourescene auto-correlation.
When I run this code
My jupyter notebook stays a lot of time saying estimating BayesianMSM 0% with no progress.
Is there anything that I missed on my code?
Thanks in advance
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: