-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Solution #4104
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Solution #4104
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your hard work on this task! 😊 While your implementation of the transformStateWithClones
function is on the right track, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed to meet the core requirements.
-
Object Mutation: The code currently mutates the
oneState
object directly within theswitch
cases. It's important to avoid direct mutations and instead create a copy usingObject.assign
or the spread operator. -
Switch Statement: The absence of a default case in your
switch
statement is a critical oversight. Adding a default case is necessary for error handling and aligns with best practices. -
Placement of Object Copy: Ensure that the line
stateClone.push(Object.assign({}, oneState));
is placed outside theswitch
block but inside the loop, as per the prompt requirements. This ensures a copy of the state is pushed to the array after processing each action. -
Naming Convention: Consider renaming
oneState
to something more descriptive likestateCopy
to improve code readability. -
Loop Choice: While not critical, using a
for...of
loop instead offor...in
for iterating over arrays is a good practice to avoid potential issues.
Please address these issues to ensure your code meets the task requirements. Keep up the great work, and don't hesitate to reach out if you need further assistance! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review
button in the Reviewers tab.
src/transformStateWithClones.js
Outdated
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
stateClone.push(Object.assign({}, oneState)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
According to the additional prompt rules, it is better to push a copy of the object to the array at the end of each loop cycle, but outside of the switch
block. Consider moving this line outside the switch
block, after the current action is processed.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Summary
Great effort on implementing the transformStateWithClones
function! 🎉 While your solution is on the right track, there are a few critical issues that need attention to fully meet the task requirements:
-
Object Mutation: Avoid mutating the
stateClone
directly. Instead, useObject.assign
or the spread operator to create a copy of the state. -
Switch Statement: Ensure a default case is present for error handling. Currently, the default case clears the entire state, which might not be intended.
-
Placement of Object Copy: The line
finalStates.push(Object.assign({}, stateClone));
should be inside the loop but outside theswitch
block to ensure a copy of the state is pushed after processing each action. -
Loop Choice: Replace the
for...in
loop with afor...of
loop for iterating over arrays to avoid potential issues. -
Initialization of
stateClone
: InitializestateClone
inside the loop to ensure a fresh copy of the state is used for each action, preventing unintended mutations. -
Naming Convention: Consider renaming
stateClone
tostateCopy
for better readability.
These improvements will enhance the functionality and readability of your code. Remember, addressing these issues will help you avoid similar problems in the future. Keep up the good work and continue learning from these experiences! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
src/transformStateWithClones.js
Outdated
@@ -7,7 +7,34 @@ | |||
* @return {Object[]} | |||
*/ | |||
function transformStateWithClones(state, actions) { | |||
// write code here | |||
const finalStates = []; | |||
const stateClone = {}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The stateClone
should be initialized inside the loop to ensure a fresh copy of the state is used for each action. This prevents unintended mutations across iterations.
src/transformStateWithClones.js
Outdated
|
||
Object.assign(stateClone, state); | ||
|
||
for (const step in actions) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider using a for...of
loop instead of for...in
for iterating over the actions
array. The for...in
loop is generally used for iterating over object properties and can lead to unexpected behavior when used with arrays.
src/transformStateWithClones.js
Outdated
default: | ||
for (const key in stateClone) { | ||
delete stateClone[key]; | ||
} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The default case currently deletes all properties from stateClone
. Ensure this behavior is intended, as it will result in an empty state object for any unrecognized action type.
src/transformStateWithClones.js
Outdated
} | ||
} | ||
|
||
finalStates.push(Object.assign({}, stateClone)); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The line finalStates.push(Object.assign({}, stateClone));
should be placed outside the switch
block but inside the loop, as per the prompt requirements. This ensures a copy of the state is pushed to the array after processing each action.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good.
No description provided.