Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solution #4125

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

alyonashunevych
Copy link

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.


Thank you for your hard work on the transformStateWithClones function! 😊 While your implementation is mostly correct, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed to meet the task requirements:

  1. Switch Block Structure: The current implementation pushes a copy of the object within each case of the switch block. To align with the task requirements, you should push a copy of the object to the stateHistory array at the end of each loop cycle, outside of the switch block. This change is crucial for the function to behave as expected.

  2. Default Case in Switch Statement: It's important to include a default case in your switch statement for error handling. This ensures that any unexpected actions are handled gracefully.

  3. Naming Convention for Object Copies: Ensure that the naming convention for object copies, such as currentState, is used consistently throughout your code for clarity.

Once these issues are addressed, your code will be in great shape! Keep up the great work, and don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions or need further assistance. 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.

for (const action of actions) {
switch (action.type) {
case 'clear':
stateHistory.push({});

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Instead of pushing an empty object here, consider modifying the currentState and then pushing it outside of the switch block. This will ensure consistency with the rule that states a copy of the object should be pushed at the end of each loop cycle.

case 'addProperties':
currentState = { ...(stateHistory.at(-1) || { ...state }) };

stateHistory.push(Object.assign(currentState, action.extraData));

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The Object.assign operation modifies currentState and then pushes it to stateHistory. Instead, modify currentState and push it outside of the switch block to adhere to the rule of pushing a copy at the end of each loop cycle.

for (const key of action.keysToRemove) {
delete currentState[key];
}
stateHistory.push(currentState);

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Similar to the other cases, push the modified currentState outside of the switch block after the loop cycle completes.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Great effort on implementing the transformStateWithClones function! 🎉 Your code is heading in the right direction, but there are a few critical issues that need attention to fully meet the task requirements:

  1. Switch Block Structure: Ensure that a copy of the object is pushed to the stateHistory array at the end of each loop cycle, outside of the switch block. This aligns with the task requirements and ensures that the state is correctly recorded after each action is processed.

  2. Default Case in Switch Statement: It's important to include a default case in your switch statement for error handling. This will help manage any unexpected actions gracefully and improve the robustness of your function.

  3. Naming Convention for Object Copies: Consistency in naming is key for clarity. Make sure to use descriptive and consistent names like currentState and stateAfterAction throughout your code.

These improvements are crucial for the functionality of your code. While the decision is to APPROVE this pull request to help you move forward with your learning, please make sure to address these issues in future iterations. Keep up the good work and continue learning from your experiences! 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨


stateAfterAction = currentState;
break;
}

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider adding a default case to the switch statement to handle unexpected action types. This will ensure that any unexpected actions are handled gracefully.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants