add task solution

[GumenchukAN]

No description provided.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

Thank you for your hard work on the transformStateWithClones function! 😊 While your implementation is on the right track, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed to fully meet the task requirements.

1. Object Mutation: The current code mutates the stateHistory object directly. It's important to create a new copy of the object for each action to avoid unintended side effects.

2. Control Flow: The task suggests using a switch statement with a default case for better readability and error handling, instead of if-else statements.

3. State Copy Placement: Ensure that the states.push operation is placed outside of the if-else block, at the end of each loop cycle, to correctly push the state copy after processing each action.

Once these issues are resolved, your solution will be much stronger. Keep up the great work, and I'm confident you'll nail it with these adjustments! 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

The states.push({ ...stateHistory }); line should be placed outside of the if-else block, at the end of each loop cycle. This ensures that the state is pushed after processing the current action, as per the additional prompt instructions.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

Review Summary

Great effort on improving the transformStateWithClones function! 🎉 While your code is on the right track, there are a few important areas that need attention to fully meet the task requirements:

1. Object Mutation: The current implementation mutates the stateHistory object directly. It's crucial to create a new copy of the object for each action to prevent unintended side effects. Consider making a copy of stateHistory at the beginning of each loop iteration.

2. Control Flow: The task suggests using a switch statement with a default case for better readability and error handling. Refactoring the if-else statements to a switch statement could enhance the clarity and maintainability of your code.

3. Naming: The variable name stateHistory could be more descriptive. Using a name like stateCopy might better convey its purpose as a copy of the state.

Despite these issues, the decision to approve your pull request is made to help you move forward with your learning journey. Please review the comments and consider addressing these points to improve your code. Remember, addressing critical issues like object mutation is essential to avoid similar problems in the future. Keep up the good work, and continue learning from these experiences! 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

The stateHistory object is being mutated directly within the loop. According to the task requirements, you should create a new copy of the object for each action to avoid unintended side effects. Consider making a copy of stateHistory at the beginning of each loop iteration.

[mateacademy-ai-mentor]

The task suggests using a switch statement with a default case for better readability and error handling, instead of if-else statements. Consider refactoring this part of the code to use a switch statement.