Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Solution #3717

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Solution #3717

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

yurzxw
Copy link

@yurzxw yurzxw commented Nov 16, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for your hard work on this task! 😊 While your solution correctly parses the string into an object, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed to fully meet the task requirements. Specifically, the use of a for loop should be replaced with iteration methods like map or filter, as specified in the task checklist. Additionally, consider improving variable naming for better readability. Once these changes are made, your solution will be in great shape! Keep up the great work and don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions. 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review button in the Reviewers tab.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Summary

Great effort on implementing the conversion of a string to an object using iteration methods like map and filter. Your code aligns with the task requirements, but there are a few areas for improvement:

  1. Iteration Methods: While you've used map and filter, the map method is being used incorrectly. It should return a new array, but here it modifies an existing object (objectStyles). This goes against the requirement to not use iteration methods to modify an existing array/object.

  2. Variable Naming: The use of result is not ideal as it decreases readability. Consider using more descriptive names to enhance clarity.

  3. Redundant Assignment: The line result = objectStyles; is redundant. You can simplify the code by directly returning objectStyles.

  4. Variable Declaration: Since objectStyles is being modified, consider using let instead of const.

These issues should be addressed to fully comply with the task requirements. However, the decision to approve your Pull Request is made to help you move forward with your learning. Please review the comments to improve your code. Remember, addressing these issues will enhance the clarity and efficiency of your code. Keep up the good work and continue learning from these experiences! 🚀

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

@@ -6,7 +6,19 @@
* @return {object}
*/
function convertToObject(sourceString) {
// write your code here
const objectStyles = {};

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Consider using let instead of const for objectStyles since it is being modified within the function.

Comment on lines +10 to +21
let result = sourceString

.split(';')
.map((style) => style.split(':'))
.filter((object) => object.length === 2)
.map(([key, value]) => {
objectStyles[key.trim()] = value.trim();
});

result = objectStyles;

return result;

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The result variable is unnecessary. You can directly return objectStyles at the end of the function, simplifying the code.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants