-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Solution #3717
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Solution #3717
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for your hard work on this task! 😊 While your solution correctly parses the string into an object, there are a few critical issues that need to be addressed to fully meet the task requirements. Specifically, the use of a for
loop should be replaced with iteration methods like map
or filter
, as specified in the task checklist. Additionally, consider improving variable naming for better readability. Once these changes are made, your solution will be in great shape! Keep up the great work and don't hesitate to reach out if you have any questions. 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
🔄 Fix the issues, commit the changes, and then re-request my review using the Re-request review
button in the Reviewers tab.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Review Summary
Great effort on implementing the conversion of a string to an object using iteration methods like map
and filter
. Your code aligns with the task requirements, but there are a few areas for improvement:
-
Iteration Methods: While you've used
map
andfilter
, themap
method is being used incorrectly. It should return a new array, but here it modifies an existing object (objectStyles
). This goes against the requirement to not use iteration methods to modify an existing array/object. -
Variable Naming: The use of
result
is not ideal as it decreases readability. Consider using more descriptive names to enhance clarity. -
Redundant Assignment: The line
result = objectStyles;
is redundant. You can simplify the code by directly returningobjectStyles
. -
Variable Declaration: Since
objectStyles
is being modified, consider usinglet
instead ofconst
.
These issues should be addressed to fully comply with the task requirements. However, the decision to approve your Pull Request is made to help you move forward with your learning. Please review the comments to improve your code. Remember, addressing these issues will enhance the clarity and efficiency of your code. Keep up the good work and continue learning from these experiences! 🚀
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
@@ -6,7 +6,19 @@ | |||
* @return {object} | |||
*/ | |||
function convertToObject(sourceString) { | |||
// write your code here | |||
const objectStyles = {}; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Consider using let
instead of const
for objectStyles
since it is being modified within the function.
let result = sourceString | ||
|
||
.split(';') | ||
.map((style) => style.split(':')) | ||
.filter((object) => object.length === 2) | ||
.map(([key, value]) => { | ||
objectStyles[key.trim()] = value.trim(); | ||
}); | ||
|
||
result = objectStyles; | ||
|
||
return result; |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The result
variable is unnecessary. You can directly return objectStyles
at the end of the function, simplifying the code.
No description provided.