solution #3744
solution #3744
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Great job on implementing the convertToObject function! 🎉 Your code meets the task requirements and constraints effectively. While there are a few minor improvements suggested, such as trimming whitespace from properties and values, handling colons within values more robustly, and ensuring consistency in parameter naming, these do not critically impact the functionality. Keep up the good work, and consider these suggestions for future enhancements! 😊
✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨
| @@ -5,8 +5,19 @@ | |||
| * | |||
| * @return {object} | |||
| */ | |||
| function convertToObject(sourceString) { | |||
| // write your code here | |||
| function convertToObject(styles) { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The function parameter is named styles, but the JSDoc comment refers to it as sourceString. Ensure consistency between the parameter name and the JSDoc comment.
| const declarations = styles.split(';'); | ||
|
|
||
| declarations.forEach((declaration) => { | ||
| const [property, value] = declaration.split(':'); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
When splitting the declaration by ':', there might be cases where the value itself contains colons (e.g., URLs). Consider using a more robust parsing method to handle such cases.
| declarations.forEach((declaration) => { | ||
| const [property, value] = declaration.split(':'); | ||
|
|
||
| if (property && value) { |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The condition if (property && value) checks for the existence of both property and value, but it does not account for cases where property or value might be whitespace. Consider trimming property and value before this check.
No description provided.