Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add solution #3794

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

add solution #3794

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

Vl-Tsr
Copy link

@Vl-Tsr Vl-Tsr commented Dec 28, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

@mateacademy-ai-mentor mateacademy-ai-mentor left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your implementation of the convertToObject function is well-done and meets all the task requirements! 🎉 While there are a couple of minor improvements suggested, such as using forEach instead of map for side effects and removing a redundant line, these do not impact the functionality of your code. Keep up the great work and consider these suggestions for even cleaner code in the future! 😊

✨ Please rate this review in the Platform's notification center. I will be grateful for your feedback! ✨

const source = sourceString;
const result = {};

source

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The line source is redundant here as it doesn't perform any operation. Consider removing it to improve code clarity.

.map((elem) => elem.split(':'))
.map((elem) => elem.map((el) => el.trim()))
.filter((elem) => elem.length > 1)
.map(([key, value]) => (result[key] = value));

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Using map here is not ideal since map is intended for transforming arrays and returning a new array. In this case, forEach would be more appropriate as you are using it for side effects (modifying the result object) rather than transforming the array.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants