Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MSC4183: Additional Error Codes for submitToken endpoint #4183

Open
wants to merge 15 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
65 changes: 65 additions & 0 deletions proposals/4183-submitToken-error-codes.md
dbkr marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
# MSC4183: Additional Error Codes for submitToken endpoint

The [`POST
/_matrix/identity/v2/validate/email/submitToken`](https://spec.matrix.org/v1.11/identity-service-api/#post_matrixidentityv2validateemailsubmittoken)
and [`POST
/_matrix/identity/v2/validate/msisdn/submitToken`](https://spec.matrix.org/v1.11/identity-service-api/#post_matrixidentityv2validatemsisdnsubmittoken)
endpoints do not specify any specific error codes, instead relying on the common error codes defined in the identity
service API.

However, these common error codes don't have any codes to signal many errors that can occur in these APIs: most
obviously, that the token the user entered was incorrect.

This MSC can be considered similar to [MSC4178](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/4178) although
that MSC is for `requestToken` on the C-S API only.

The [`POST
/_matrix/client/v3/account/3pid/email/requestToken`](https://spec.matrix.org/v1.11/client-server-api/#post_matrixclientv3account3pidemailrequesttoken)
endpoint in the C/S API also specifies a `submit_url` response parameter, defining its parameters to be the same as the
Identity API's `submitToken` endpoints. Everything this MSC specifies applies to this endpoint in the same way.

## Proposal

Add the following specific error code as a code that can be returned by the two endpoints given above:
* `M_TOKEN_INCORRECT`: Indicates that the token that the user entered to validate the session is incorrect.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would it be worth re-using/redefining M_UNKNOWN_TOKEN from the C-S API?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oh, yes, probably

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

On second thoughts... that's talking about an access token whereas this is the user entering a code that's been sent to them, so they're not really the same thing. I think maybe it's clearer if it's a separate code? I can update the MSC to call this out if you agree.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think maybe it's clearer if it's a separate code?

(I agree)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Noted this in c026da7


Note that we deliberately chose not to re-use `M_UNKNOWN_TOKEN` since that refers to an access token, whereas this
refers to a token that the user enters.

HTTP status code 400 should be used for this error.

Additionally specify that the following common error codes can be returned:
* `M_INVALID_PARAM`: One of the supplied parameters in not valid.
* `M_SESSION_EXPIRED`: The validation session is question has expired.

HTTP status code 400 should also be used for both of these errors.

Also change the corresponding submitYoken-like API given in the C/S API's definition of [`POST
/_matrix/client/v3/account/3pid/email/requestToken`](https://spec.matrix.org/v1.11/client-server-api/#post_matrixclientv3account3pidemailrequesttoken)
to specify that both request and response parameters / error codes are the same as the I/S API version, rather than just parameters, apart from needing an I/S API token.

## Potential issues

None foreseen.

## Alternatives

None considered.

## Security considerations

None foreseen.

## Unstable prefix

No unstable prefix is deemed necessary. Sydent already sends the common error codes and also sends
`M_NO_VALID_SESSION` if the code is incorrect. Once an identity server (or homeserver) switches to
use the new error code, clients (including homeservers proxying the IS API) may not recognise the
error condition correctly until updated to support the new code. We say that this is acceptable in
favour of avoiding the complexity of negotiating error codes with API versions. Since the identity
server is generally used via the homeserver now, most users of this API will not currently receive
a sensible error code in this situation anyway.

## Dependencies

None