Welcome to Origins Discussions!

[mayabenowitz]

👋 Welcome!

We’re using Discussions as a place to connect with other members of our community. We hope that you:

• Ask questions you’re wondering about.
• Share ideas.
• Engage with other community members.
• Welcome others and are open-minded. Remember that this is a community we
  build together 💪.

To get started, comment below with an introduction of yourself and tell us about what you do with this community.

[jmarkmorris]

Hi Maya and future community members,

My name is Mark. I wish to apply to be in this community because I think I can offer the treasure map to the physical implementation of nature and I think this may dovetail and map to the ontology of the theory and mathematics you are working to build. Since GR and QM offer no implementation, even if you were to replace GR and QM, you would still lack a physical implementation.

• What do I mean by treasure map? I may have sleuthed out a missed opportunity during the classical to quantum transition.
• It seems only one to one mappings of point charges were considered for the electron and the hydrogen nucleus (H+, i.e. a proton).
• Neutrons (0 charge) and Quarks (-2/3, -1/3, +1/3, +2/3 charges) were not yet known, nor were the rest of the standard model.
• The treasure map says "Assembly architecture buried here!"
• I may have found a solution to nature with magnitude |e/6| point charges.
• The point charges would have a universal constant speed for their spherically expanding potential emission.
• The point charges would follow a continuous path through Euclidean time and 3D space, modeled as R4.
• These point charges would have no speed limit, but in practicality, high speed individual point charges are likely to cause reactions with assemblies they pass near to on their path. I imagine the outcome like a particle shower in a collider.
• However, a point charge in a tight orbital loop with its equal and opposite point charge could very well exceed field speed.
• Lastly, I am thinking the point charges are immutable, either through asymptotic safety (at their level) or passing through the same R4 point. In other words, no annhilation. No creation. Point charges just are. This area could be re-examined, but it seems to work for now to at least get us to the implementation level under GR and QM.

I can show how this parsimonious model yields assemblies that map extremely well to general relativity and the standard model, and go further to resolve many open questions and paradoxes. The point charge assembly model makes it very easy to visualize what is really going on at the lowest levels, and you also get provenance of point charges, so you can model or simulate the path each one travels.

I'll make a post providing some more of my ideas around point charge assemblies and also how I would map that architecture to Maya's paper abstract — because I think it is fascinating to see the correspondences.