-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Has-proper-part and has-part usage Dron not compatible with RO #3
Comments
Team is investigating the source code. |
@dillerm and @hoganwr will look at Scala code in BitBucket repo. @LightGrenadier will check on access with Erik Schmidt for the previous people. Looks like the lookup of the object property IRI by its rdfs:label is calling the SQL database. |
Note, this is now an easy fix @hoganwr as only the declarations remain - they can just be deleted. |
Thanks for letting me know! Had I realized it I would have fixed in the
most recent release LOL. Will take care of it ASAP.
…On Fri, Dec 20, 2024 at 3:39 PM Nico Matentzoglu ***@***.***> wrote:
Note, this is now an easy fix @hoganwr <https://github.com/hoganwr> as
only the declarations remain - they can just be deleted.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#3 (comment)>, or
unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJR55X6S7LTNQZZX3MZCWT2GSFC5AVCNFSM6AAAAABT74H65WVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZDKNJXG42TAOBRGI>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Actually, when you build the components, dron-ingredient.owl still uses it extensively. I think this is as simple as replacing it with the proper RO object property in the build scripts that create the three component OWL files. But it needs to be done and tested. Will work on this ASAP, but am currently working on the PATO import. |
To get DrOn to be fully compatible with RO, you should consider to migrate the following two relations:
To their proper RO counterparts.
Originally, I thought that this needed changes to the DrOn builder pipeline:
but with a bit of luck, the
DrOnBuilder.scala
is generic enough to handle changes to DrOn as long as therdfs:label
has_proper_part
is preserved:Not 100% positive though, would need someone testing it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: