You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Are multiple variants allowed for the same reported isomiR sequence?
For example, isomiR Sequence TGGGGCGGAGCTTCCGGAGGC has the following possible locations just within miRBase22.
MIMAT0015058_2&hsa-miR-3180-3p&offsets|0|-1
MIMAT0018178_1&hsa-miR-3180&offsets|0|+2
MIMAT0015058_1&hsa-miR-3180-3p&offsets|0|-1
MIMAT0015058&hsa-miR-3180-3p&offsets|0|-1
If so, what would the recommendation of the above be? Should folks generating the GFF3 file be encouraged to report all four (including the 0|-1 and 0|+2 offsets) above within Column 9->Attributes->variant?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Right now this is solve by adding the sequence 4 times in the GFF and each of them with a Variant attribute and Hits will be = 4. As well, the attribute TAG can be a specific one. It would be good to have some ideas of this.
I think for me works adding four lines, and I think I'll like to have a TAG that says ambiguous, beside the number of Hits.
In the case of the same read is exactly the same just mapping equally to other precursors of the same miRNA, but the Variants for instance being the same value, we can put multiple precursors under Parent. This happens if the same miRNA have different precursors like some of hsa-let7 but actually nothing else change.
Are multiple variants allowed for the same reported isomiR sequence?
For example, isomiR Sequence TGGGGCGGAGCTTCCGGAGGC has the following possible locations just within miRBase22.
MIMAT0015058_2&hsa-miR-3180-3p&offsets|0|-1
MIMAT0018178_1&hsa-miR-3180&offsets|0|+2
MIMAT0015058_1&hsa-miR-3180-3p&offsets|0|-1
MIMAT0015058&hsa-miR-3180-3p&offsets|0|-1
If so, what would the recommendation of the above be? Should folks generating the GFF3 file be encouraged to report all four (including the 0|-1 and 0|+2 offsets) above within Column 9->Attributes->variant?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: