Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update copy_strip_binary.sh: use "make install" instead #21464

Merged
merged 31 commits into from
Jul 24, 2024
Merged

Update copy_strip_binary.sh: use "make install" instead #21464

merged 31 commits into from
Jul 24, 2024

Conversation

snnn
Copy link
Member

@snnn snnn commented Jul 23, 2024

Description

Before this change, copy_strip_binary.sh manually copies each file from onnx runtime's build folder to an artifact folder. It can be hard when dealing with symbolic link for shared libraries.
This PR will change the packaging pipelines to run "make install" first, before packaging shared libs .

Motivation and Context

Recently because of feature request #21281 , we changed libonnxruntime.so's SONAME. Now every package that contains this shared library must also contains libonnxruntime.so.1. Therefore we need to change the packaging scripts to include this file. Instead of manually construct the symlink layout, using make install is much easier and will make things more consistent because it is a standard way of making packages.

Breaking change:
After this change, our inference tarballs that are published to our Github release pages will be not contain ORT training headers.

@snnn snnn marked this pull request as ready for review July 24, 2024 02:18
@snnn snnn requested a review from a team as a code owner July 24, 2024 02:18
@snnn snnn merged commit b04adcc into main Jul 24, 2024
281 of 297 checks passed
@snnn snnn deleted the r2 branch July 24, 2024 17:02
snnn added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 1, 2024
### Description
The header files were added in PR #16454. 
Then, recently I made a PR #21464 that changed how we packed Linux
tarballs.
The new tarball misses the custom op header files.
Therefore I need to make this change.


### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
prathikr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 6, 2024
### Description
The header files were added in PR #16454. 
Then, recently I made a PR #21464 that changed how we packed Linux
tarballs.
The new tarball misses the custom op header files.
Therefore I need to make this change.


### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
prathikr pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 7, 2024
### Description
The header files were added in PR #16454. 
Then, recently I made a PR #21464 that changed how we packed Linux
tarballs.
The new tarball misses the custom op header files.
Therefore I need to make this change.


### Motivation and Context
<!-- - Why is this change required? What problem does it solve?
- If it fixes an open issue, please link to the issue here. -->
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants