Effect of fossil fuel & environmental related campaign contributions on the voting behavior of US House members on methane related bills
You can find the actual thesis here
├── README.md
├── src
│ ├── analysis
│ │ ├── plots
│ │ ├── model
│ ├── cleaning
│ │ ├── utils
├── data
│ ├── cleaned
│ ├── original (raw data)
├── presentation
├── thesis/template-typst
│ ├── common
│ ├── figures
│ ├── thesis_typ
df.csv
-> dataframe of all representatives, their IDs, votes, contributions and control variables (DW-nominate, seniority, party affiliations, gender, etc.)roll_call.csv
-> dataframe of all representatives who partook in at least one of the congressional sessions 113-117, incl. their IDs, full names, party affiliation, etc.contribs_long.csv
-> dataframe of the individual and PAC contributions which each representative received within six months of the vote, from only relevant (energy - fossil fuel and enviornmentally related source), pivoted by the vote
roll_call.csv
-> roll_call data of 6 methane bills (between 113 - 117th session)representatives.csv
-> cleaned representative data of all sessions (113 - 117th session)contributions.csv
-> contributions of oil, gas, mining, coal, environmental and alternative energy industries to representatives (113 - 117th session)unique_id_reps.csv
-> unique id of all house membersfinal_df.csv
-> roll_call and contributions dfs merged on unique_id_reps' member_id.
- OpenSecrets
- all contribution data (of all house candidates)
- LCVScorecard
- all roll_call data
- Clerk of the House
- house members of congresses 113 and 117,114, 115, 116.
- Bioguide
- Github Congress Repository
The main branch only includes the data and analysis from the main results, i.e. those with the contributions within 6 months of the vote, not the contributions of the entire previous congressional election. The results from the aggregate contributions can be found on the emergency-backup
branch.