-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
R105
Asymmetric Perspective is a T Perspective or P Perspective
Every Binary Association defines a Perspective on each of its two sides.
While the Perspective names distinguish each side, we need a way to talk about the two sides in the abstract and have chosen the T and P names.
These two names are arbitrarily assigned to the Perspectives of each Binary Association.
The combination of a specialization and two 1:1 associations is modeling idiom that allows us to formalize a 1:2 multiplicity. Thus a Binary Association requires exactly two Perspectives while a Perspective is defined on exactly one Binary Association. This could be accomplished without highlighting the T and P Perspectives with their own subclasses, but the specialization serves to make our policy a bit more explicit.
Modeler's note [LS]: I've gone back and forth on this one, but I believe that the minor optimization of collapsing R105 doesn't buy us much. As the model stands, it's pretty clear that all Perspectives are T, P or S and that T and P are paired on a Binary Association while S stands alone on a Unary Association. All things being equal, clarity of purpose wins the day.
<subclass>.(Rnum, Domain, Side) -> Asymmetric Perspective.(Rnum, Domain, Side)
Copyright © 2021-2023 Leon Starr