-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move user journey tests to a package #562
Move user journey tests to a package #562
Conversation
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Seems okay to me!
Personally, I'd maybe just name the package e2e
or e2e-test
not user-journey
, but not a super strong opinion.
Agree. Here's my 2 cents on the topic. The convention adopted by NX is However, in this case, we're not testing a single project but the entire stack. For instance, Twenty, a monorepo project I closely follow, uses a slightly different convention: https://github.com/twentyhq/twenty/tree/main/packages/twenty-e2e-testing. I suggest we adopt something similar, like I'm aware that it currently clashes with the @Ptroger you can easily rename a project using NX's rename workspace https://nx.dev/nx-api/workspace/generators/move |
User journey tests are run against the whole monorepo e2e.
They are meant to enforce core functionality works from the end user perspective.
This PR moves these tests from 'armory-sdk' to a different package 'user-journey'.