Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

delete signMessage decoding #567

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

Ptroger
Copy link
Contributor

@Ptroger Ptroger commented Oct 23, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 23, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
devtool ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 23, 2024 1:09pm
manager 🔄 Building (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Oct 23, 2024 1:09pm

@@ -83,7 +78,7 @@ export type Config = {
transactionRegistry?: TransactionRegistry
supportedMethods?: MethodsMapping
}
export type DecodeInput = TransactionInput | MessageInput | RawInput | TypedDataInput
export type DecodeInput = TransactionInput | RawInput | TypedDataInput
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I thought raw and typed data would also be removed. Maybe I misunderstood something.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I want to remove them. Problem is that changes rego evaluation, because rego uses the result of intent decoding for typed Data. So I'm gonna do it after I merged regal PR. I could have done it for raw here, but I'd rather just limit this PR to signMessage because it's the scope of the bug. Then I'll do the two others in a subsequent one once regal is merged

@Ptroger Ptroger marked this pull request as ready for review October 24, 2024 09:19
@Ptroger Ptroger merged commit cd7fdfa into main Oct 24, 2024
11 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants