Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MTC improvements on applying project cards #332

Draft
wants to merge 56 commits into
base: develop_with_ranch
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

i-am-sijia
Copy link
Collaborator

For comparison purposes...

i-am-sijia and others added 30 commits November 9, 2020 11:44
    1. Scalar values were different
    2. MTC needed additional variables copied to managed lanes
    3. Different foreign key for shapes
    4. Scenario initiation from a Scenario instance OR a dictionary representing one

Co-authored-by: David Ory <david.ory@gmail.com>
- moved parameters from client.py to modules
- added params to class instances
- parameterized methods for non instance-level vars

TODO: update all notebooks and usage.
Fixes network-wrangler#229 by making methods parameterizable and storing most client settings in RoadwayNetwork and TransitNetwork instance-level with good defaults rather than class-level variables.

Also:
- Added notebook testing
- Some other clean up
- Allow new columns to be added wholesale
- Also fixes network-wrangler#257
…etwork_wrangler into generic_agency"

This reverts commit 10631be, reversing
changes made to c8213f9.
when `managed` exists in the network (before applying the managed project card), and `managed` is not specified for newly added links (which can be assumed 0).
i-am-sijia and others added 26 commits August 5, 2021 17:41
(oops, committed too quickly)
1) disable automatic logging for all scripts through __init__.py; 2) add separate info and debug logging.
See network-wrangler#286
@e-lo
Copy link
Collaborator

e-lo commented Oct 21, 2024

@yueshuaing and @i-am-sijia : I believe this PR is now moot and can be closed?

If there are any remaining items, please:

  1. add an issue
  2. create a test in selection refactor branch that if passes, will close this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants