Fix up the NSF Templar

[chrome-cirrus]

About the PR

This PR modernizes the Templar substantially, quite similar to the Watchdog. Lots of changes including:

• Directional fans instead of tiny fans
• Two can atmos setup
• NFSD livery decals and airlocks

Why / Balance

Compliance with tiny fan destruction guidelines, general modernization of one of the older/deadlier ship designs.

How to test

Spawn one in game, fly around, arrest some perps maybe.

Media

Requirements

• I have read and am following the Pull Request and Changelog Guidelines.
• I have added media to this PR or it does not require an ingame showcase.

Breaking changes

Changelog

[chrome-cirrus]

Replaced the generator with some wall APUs per guidance from Dvir01. Moved the wall recharger to a table model in the cockpit so it's not accessible from outside.

[chrome-cirrus]

Also added some firelocks to the new Templar, and to the Watchdog.

[Tych0theSynth]

For additional neatness, you could move the waste vent under the port reverse thruster and remove that extra lattice. Looks good otherwise. I think the Templar has needed something like this for a while.

[chrome-cirrus]

For additional neatness, you could move the waste vent under the port reverse thruster and remove that extra lattice. Looks good otherwise. I think the Templar has needed something like this for a while.

I've seen that on a few ships. Is that actually a valid placement if one had to rebuild it after damage or something? I kinda hate hiding components that way (as an engi/atmos player who has had a few "where is that goddamn vent?!" moments) but it would make for a cleaner look, it's true...

[Tych0theSynth]

I've seen that on a few ships. Is that actually a valid placement if one had to rebuild it after damage or something? I kinda hate hiding components that way (as an engi/atmos player who has had a few "where is that goddamn vent?!" moments) but it would make for a cleaner look, it's true...

Yup, pretty certain it's valid. You can anchor machines on top of vents and scrubbers without affecting their output, plus if you need an engineer to fix something they will likely be using a t-ray and should be able to fathom it out.

[chrome-cirrus]

I've seen that on a few ships. Is that actually a valid placement if one had to rebuild it after damage or something? I kinda hate hiding components that way (as an engi/atmos player who has had a few "where is that goddamn vent?!" moments) but it would make for a cleaner look, it's true...

Yup, pretty certain it's valid. You can anchor machines on top of vents and scrubbers without affecting their output, plus if you need an engineer to fix something they will likely be using a t-ray and should be able to fathom it out.

Nice, tested it out and that's totally a valid placement, so I moved that exhaust vent under the thruster. Thanks for questioning how it was initially! Was bugging me that the extra grid modified the ship's profile on radar, too...

[Tych0theSynth]

Looks good! It's what I always do unless I already have lots of external free lattice for practical reasons. It looks so much tidier.

[PeccNeck]

Hmm.

Not sure what this guy's doing here. Not present on the Watchdog, either. Also not sure what the consensus is on interior fans like this. Either way, let it be known this straggler exists... for now.

[chrome-cirrus]

Not sure what this guy's doing here. Not present on the Watchdog, either. Also not sure what the consensus is on interior fans like this. Either way, let it be known this straggler exists... for now.

Whoops! That door didn't start as an interior door in the OG Templar design so it had a fan on it, and I somehow didn't catch that while replacing the dang airlock with another variant. It's gone now.

[dvir001]

Good to go