Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Integrate Testfairy app distribution in the template for internal distribution [feature branch] #414

Open
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: feature/testfairy-distribution
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rfabre
Copy link

@rfabre rfabre commented Sep 16, 2024

GitHub Issue: #

Proposed Changes

  • Bug fix
  • Feature
  • Code style update (formatting)
  • Refactoring (no functional changes, no api changes)
  • Build or CI related changes
  • Documentation content changes
  • Other, please describe:

Description

I'm integrating Testfairy app distribution(https://www.testfairy.com/app-distribution) as a potential replacement for AppCenter.

Impact on version

  • Major
    • The template structure was changed.
  • Minor
    • New functionalities were added.
  • Patch
    • A bug in behavior was fixed.
    • Documentation was changed.

PR Checklist

Always applicable

No matter your changes, these checks always apply.

  • Your conventional commits are aligned with the Impact on version section.
  • Updated CHANGELOG.md.
    • Use the latest Major.Minor.X header if you do a Patch change.
    • Create a new Major.Minor.X header if you do a Minor or Major change.
    • If you create a new header, it aligns with the Impact on version section and matches what is generated in the build pipeline.
  • Documentation files were updated according with the changes.
    • Update README.md and TemplateConfig.md if you made changes to templating.
    • Update AzurePipelines.md and APP_README.md if you made changes to pipelines.
    • Update Diagnostics.md if you made changes to diagnostic tools.
    • Update Architecture.md and its diagrams if you made architecture decisions or if you introduced new recipes.
    • ...and so forth: Make sure you update the documentation files associated to the recipes you changed. Review the topics by looking at the content of the doc/ folder.
  • Images about the template are referenced from the wiki and added as images in this git.
  • TODO comments are hints for next steps for users of the template and not planned work.

Contextual

Based on your changes these checks may not apply.

  • Automated tests for the changes have been added/updated.
  • Tested on all relevant platforms

Other information

Internal Issue (If applicable):

parameters:
applicationEnvironment: Production
deploymentEnvironment: GooglePlay
# Use this to schedule a build at defined days and times
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why does it look like every line changed?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It was caused by VS Code "Format on save"

- template: build/stage-release-appstore.yml
parameters:
applicationEnvironment: Staging
trigger: # Start a new run as soon as a "canaries/build/(...)" branch is created.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why does it look like every line changed?

APP_README.md Outdated
## Additional Information

TODO: Add any other relevant information. e.g. You could link to your _Definition of Done_, more documentation, UI mockups, etc.
# Your Project Name
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Same here. Perhaps your line endings are wrong.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah there's definitely a problem. This comment applies to almost every file.

@@ -0,0 +1,218 @@
GEM
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should this file be excluded from source control? It seems generated.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This ensures that you have the same versions all the time and that it don't breaks because of a new version of a dependency.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed the file.

@rfabre rfabre force-pushed the dev/rofa/testfairy-deployment branch 6 times, most recently from 384b1ee to e668bfe Compare September 23, 2024 17:32
@rfabre rfabre force-pushed the dev/rofa/testfairy-deployment branch from e668bfe to c61bfc2 Compare September 23, 2024 20:07
@rfabre rfabre changed the base branch from main to feature/testfairy-distribution November 15, 2024 19:55
@rfabre rfabre force-pushed the dev/rofa/testfairy-deployment branch from 2dc691c to 6bad816 Compare November 18, 2024 13:46
@rfabre rfabre force-pushed the dev/rofa/testfairy-deployment branch from 6bad816 to 7c046b6 Compare November 18, 2024 13:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants