Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Humeral Artery Right and Left #3277

Open
masciam opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 11 comments
Open

Humeral Artery Right and Left #3277

masciam opened this issue May 14, 2024 · 11 comments
Assignees

Comments

@masciam
Copy link

masciam commented May 14, 2024

Preferred term label:
Humeral Artery Right
Humeral Artery Left

Synonyms

Definition (free text, please give PubMed ID)
Humeral Artery Right is a Humeral Artery that is part of or located in right arm
Humeral Artery Left is a Humeral Artery that is part of or is located in left arm

Parent term (use https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols/ontologies/uberon)
Humeral Artery Right
Humeral Artery Left

Your nano-attribution (ORCID)
https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1940-6740

@aleixpuigb
Copy link
Collaborator

aleixpuigb commented May 15, 2024

Thank you for your request. This request is a bit problematic because we try to not add symmetrical bilateral structures in Uberon. Please, see the following tickets for previous discussion about this topic: #2043 and #2035 (comment)
Currently, there are plans to introduce posterior humeral circumflex artery and anterior humeral circumflex artery in Uberon by HuBMAP.

@masciam
Copy link
Author

masciam commented Jun 3, 2024

@aleixpuigb do there is no possibility ho map to the FMA66324 and FMA 66325? I can use the FMA term but I wanted to keep using one ontology only. I have additional terms that are of the same type try to request for laterslity. So what you suggest?
thanks
AM

@aleixpuigb
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @masciam, we are currently reviewing Uberon policies for bilateral blood vessels. If they can be added, I will proceed with these two terms. Thank you!

@masciam
Copy link
Author

masciam commented Jun 13, 2024

Ok thank you!
AM

@masciam
Copy link
Author

masciam commented Jul 18, 2024

@aleixpuigb any news about this request?
Thank you
AM

@aleixpuigb
Copy link
Collaborator

Thank you for checking. @cmungall @jamesamcl I think there were some talks about this where I was not involved. Would these two terms be acceptable to be added to Uberon. If so, I can modify the DOSDP to add right and left veins or arteries.

@emquardokus
Copy link
Collaborator

@aleixpuigb please check the VCCF ontology work for blood vasculature addition. This was discussed as part of Griffin Weber's work too.

@aleixpuigb
Copy link
Collaborator

@masciam, in today's Uberon meeting it has been decided to add these two term. Sorry it has taken so long, we don't have a clear policy for right/left structures.

@masciam
Copy link
Author

masciam commented Aug 19, 2024 via email

@aleixpuigb aleixpuigb self-assigned this Aug 20, 2024
@aleixpuigb
Copy link
Collaborator

Currently 'humeral artery' is not in Uberon. As I mentioned earlier, there are plans to add posterior humeral circumflex artery and anterior humeral circumflex artery, but not 'humeral artery', would a right and left versions of these two terms would be good for you, or do you need specifically 'left/right humeral artery'?

@aleixpuigb
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi @masciam, I have added posterior humeral circumflex artery and anterior humeral circumflex artery into Uberon and I am looking to add the terms you requested. I think it would be appropriate that the terms added would be:

  • humeral circumflex artery
  • right humeral circumflex artery
  • left humeral circumflex artery

Do you agree with these names? the humeral circumflex artery would be a virtual artery to group the anterior and posterior humeral circumflex arteries, but if you need to point to an artery I would recommend the more specific ones.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants