Lip should be part of face

[aleixpuigb]

Uberon term
lip

Suggested revision and reasons
Lip is part of mouth, but not part of face.

[rays22]

Consider dropping the 'face 'has part' some mouth' assertion (asserted for UBERON:0001456).
See discussion the discussion here.

[uberon]

Why?

…

On Mon, Jul 15, 2024 at 4:28 PM Aleix Puig ***@***.***> wrote: *Uberon term* lip <http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0001833> *Suggested revision and reasons* Lip is part of mouth, but not part of face. — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#3311>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAGZRCCNUAFYXVNO2FXHDWTZMPTABAVCNFSM6AAAAABK4Y7FU2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43ASLTON2WKOZSGQYDSMBSGMYDIMY> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[rays22]

Why?

The Suggested revision and reasons should actually read:

Lip is part of mouth, and it should be also part of face.
The reason is to prevent inferring (transitively) that 'lingual tonsil' is part of 'face'.

See obophenotype/upheno#957 (comment)

The changes implemented in the associated PR are as follows

1. UBERON:0001833 lip
   • 'lip' remains part of 'mouth'
   • in the associated PR 'lip' becomes also part of 'face'

[Term]
id: UBERON:0001833
name: lip
...
relationship: part_of UBERON:0000165 {source="BTO", source="FMA-implicit", source="VHOG", source="ZFA"} ! mouth
+relationship: part_of UBERON:0001456 ! face
...

2. 'face' no longer 'has part' 'mouth' in the associated PR

id: UBERON:0001456
name: face
...
- relationship: has_part UBERON:0000165 ! mouth
...