Skip to content
forked from sass/sass-spec

Official Sass Spec Suite

License

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

oddbird/sass-spec

 
 

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

sass-spec

A cross-implementation Sass test suite

Build Status

sass-spec is the official Sass test suite. It's used by all major Sass implementations to ensure that they correctly implement the language.

Language Specs

The bulk of this repository is taken up by language specs, which test how accurately an implementation implements the Sass language. They live in the spec directory.

Running Language Specs

Before running specs, you'll need to install [Node.js] 14.14 or newer. Then, from the root of this repo, run npm install.

From there, it depends which implementation you're testing:

Dart Sass

To run specs against Dart Sass, the reference implementation of Sass that's used for the sass package on npm, you'll first need to install Dart. Then run:

# If you already have a clone of the Dart Sass repo, you can use that instead.
git clone https://github.com/sass/dart-sass
(cd dart-sass; dart pub get)
export DART_SASS_PATH=`pwd`/dart-sass

npm run sass-spec -- --dart $DART_SASS_PATH

LibSass

As LibSass is approaching end-of-life and hasn't had new feature changes in years, this repository no longer supports running tests against it.

Spec Structure

Each spec is defined by a directory with an input.scss or input.sass file and either:

  • An output.css file, in which case the spec asserts that the Sass implementation compiles the input to the output. These specs are known as "success specs".
  • An error file, in which case the spec asserts that the Sass implementation prints the error message to standard error and exits with a non-zero status code when it compiles the input. These specs are known as "error specs".

These files may also have variants that are specific to individual implementations.

The path to the spec serves as the spec's name, which should tersely describe what it's testing. Additional explanation, if necessary, is included in a silent comment in the input file. Specs may also contain additional files that are used by the input file, as well as various other features which are detailed below.

HRX

Most specs are stored in HRX files, which are human-readable plain-text archives that define a virtual filesystem. This format makes it easy for code reviewers to see the context of specs they're reviewing. The spec runner treats each HRX file as a directory with the same name as the file, minus .hrx. For example:

<===> input.scss
ul {
  margin-left: 1em;
  li {
    list-style-type: none;
  }
}

<===> output.css
ul {
  margin-left: 1em;
}
ul li {
  list-style-type: none;
}

HRX archives can also contain directories. This allows us to write multiple specs for the same feature in a single file rather than spreading them out across hundreds of separate tiny files. By convention, we include an HRX comment with 80 = characters between each spec to help keep them visually separate. For example:

<===> unbracketed/input.scss
a {b: is-bracketed(foo bar)}

<===> unbracketed/output.scss
a {b: false}

<===>
================================================================================
<===> bracketed/input.scss
a {b: is-bracketed([foo bar])}

<===> bracketed/output.scss
a {b: true}

Each HRX archive shouldn't be much longer than 500 lines. Once one gets too long, its subdirectories should be split out into separate archives beneath a physical directory. Conversely, if a given directory contains many small HRX archives, they should be merged together into one larger file. This helps ensure that the repo remains easy to navigate.

The only specs that aren't written in HRX format are those that include invalid UTF-8 byte sequences. The HRX format is itself written in UTF-8, so it's unable to represent the files in these specs.

Specifying Warnings

By default, Sass implementations are expected to emit nothing on standard error when executing a success spec. However, if a warning file is added to the spec directory, the spec will assert that the Sass implementation prints that warning message to standard error as well as compiling the output. This is used to test the behavior of the @debug and @warn rules, as well as various warnings (particularly deprecation warnings) emitted by the Sass implementation itself.

Warnings can't be specified for error specs, since everything an implementation emits on standard error is considered part of the error message that's validated against error.

Implementation-Specific Expectations

Sometimes different Sass implementations produce different but equally-valid CSS outputs or error messages for the same input. To accommodate this, implementation-specific output, error, and warning files may be created by adding -dart-sass after the file's name (but before its extension, in the case of output.css).

When a spec is running for an implementation with an implementations-specific expectation, the normal expectation is ignored completely in favor of the implementation-specific one. It's even possible (although rare) for one implementation to expect an input file to produce an error while another expects it to compile successfully.

Options

Metadata for a spec and options for how it's run can be written in an options.yml file in the spec's directory. This file applies recursively to all specs within its directory, so it can be used to configure many specs at once. All options must begin with :.

All options that are supported for new specs are listed below. A few additional legacy options exist that are no longer considered good style and will eventually be removed.

:todo

---
:todo:
- sass/dart-sass#123456

This option indicates implementations that should add support for a spec, but haven't done so yet. When running specs for a given implementation, all specs marked as :todo for that implementation are skipped by default. This ensures that the build remains green while clearly marking which specs are expected to pass eventually.

Implementations can be (and should be) specified as shorthand GitHub issue references rather than plain names. This makes it easy to track whether the implementation has fixed the issue, and to see which specs correspond to which issue. When marking an issue as :todo for an implementation, please either find an existing issue to reference or file a new one.

If the --run-todo flag is passed to sass-spec.rb, specs marked as :todo for the current implementation will be run, and their failures will be reported.

If the --probe-todo flag is passed to sass-spec.rb, specs marked as :todo for the current implementation will be run, but a failure will be reported only if those specs pass. This is used to determine which specs need to have :todo removed once a feature has been implemented. This can be used in combination with --interactive to automatically remove :todos for these specs.

:warning_todo
---
:warning_todo:
- sass/dart-sass#123456

This option works like :todo, except instead of skipping the entire test for listed implementations it only skips validating that spec's warnings. The rest of the spec is run and verified as normal. This should not be used for error specs.

:ignore_for
---
:ignore_for:
- dart-sass

This option indicates implementations that are never expected to be compatible with a given spec. It's used for specs for old features that some but not all implementations have dropped support for.

Spec Style

The specs in this repo accumulated haphazardly over the years from contributions from many different people, so there's not currently much by way of unified style or organization. However, all new specs should follow the style guide, and old specs should be migrated to be style-guide compliant whenever possible.

Interactive Mode

If you pass --interactive to npm run sass-spec, it will run in interactive mode. In this mode, whenever a spec would fail, the spec runner stops and provides the user with a prompt that allows them to inspect the failure and determine how to handle it. This makes it easy to add implementation-specific expectations or mark specs as :todo. For example:

In test case: spec/core_functions/color/hsla/four_args/alpha_percent
Output does not match expectation.
i. Show me the input.
d. show diff.
O. Update expected output and pass test.
I. Migrate copy of test to pass on dart-sass.
T. Mark spec as todo for dart-sass.
G. Ignore test for dart-sass FOREVER.
f. Mark as failed.
X. Exit testing.

Any option can also be applied to all future occurences of that type of failure by adding ! after it. For example, if you want to mark all failing specs as :todo for the current implementation you'd type I!.

Runner Tests

The unit tests for the spec runner are located in the test/ directory. To run these unit tests, run:

npm run test

JS API Specs

In addition to the Sass language itself, the Sass specification describes a JavaScript API that should be used when exposing a Sass implementation in JavaScript. This repository also contains tests for the JavaScript API, located in the js-api-spec directory.

Running JS API Specs

JS API specs are run using npm run js-api-spec. It takes two mandatory arguments:

  • --sassSassRepo: The path to a clone of the Sass language specification repository. This is used to load the type declarations for the JavaScript API, whose canonical form is written as part of the specification.

  • --sassPackage: The path to the npm package to test. This package should expose an implementation of the Sass JavaScript API.

The JS API specs are run using Jasmine.

Dart Sass

To run specs against Dart Sass, the reference implementation of Sass that's used for the sass package on npm, you'll first need to install Dart. Then run:

# If you already have a clone of the Sass language repo, you can use that
# instead.
git clone https://github.com/sass/sass
export SASS_SASS_PATH=`pwd`/sass

# If you already have a clone of the Dart Sass repo, you can use that instead.
git clone https://github.com/sass/dart-sass
(
  cd dart-sass
  dart pub get
  dart run grinder pkg-npm-dev
)
export DART_SASS_PATH=`pwd`/dart-sass

npm run js-api-spec -- --sassSassRepo $SASS_SASS_PATH --sassPackage $DART_SASS_PATH/build/npm

Whenever you modify Dart Sass, make sure to re-run dart run grinder pkg-npm-dev to rebuild the JavaScript output.

Browser Build

To run specs against Dart Sass compiled for a browser context, add the --browser flag to the above command:

npm run js-api-spec -- --sassSassRepo $SASS_SASS_PATH --sassPackage $DART_SASS_PATH/build/npm --browser

Embedded Host

To run specs against the Node Embedded Host, which embeds Dart Sass as a subprocess for increased performance and is available as the sass-embedded package on npm, you'll first need to install Dart. Then run:

# If you already have a clone of the Sass language repo, you can use that
# instead.
git clone https://github.com/sass/sass
export SASS_SASS_PATH=`pwd`/sass

# If you already have a clone of the Dart Sass repo, you can use that instead.
git clone https://github.com/sass/embedded-host-node
(
  cd embedded-host-node
  npm install
  npm run init
  npm run compile
)
export SASS_EMBEDDED_PATH=`pwd`/embedded-host-node

npm run js-api-spec -- --sassSassRepo $SASS_SASS_PATH --sassPackage $SASS_EMBEDDED_PATH

Whenever you modify the Sass embedded host, make sure to re-run npm run compile to rebuild the JavaScript output.

Implementation-Specific Expectations

The js-api-spec/utils.ts file exposes a sassImpl getter that returns the name of the implementation (at time of writing, either 'dart-sass' or 'sass-embedded'). You can use this field to give specs different behavior for different implementations if necessary.

The utils file also exposes a skipForImpl() function, which skips an entire block of specs for an implementation. This is typically used when testing behavior that isn't yet supported by all implementations.

About

Official Sass Spec Suite

Resources

License

Code of conduct

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published

Languages

  • SCSS 95.0%
  • TypeScript 4.9%
  • Other 0.1%