Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle persistent no rate limit case #660

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

ohmtech-rdi
Copy link
Owner

This PR handles the case where we don't want persistent rate limitation, for example during a production line calibration phase.

This is needed during a calibration phase, where we don't want rate
limitation.
@ohmtech-rdi ohmtech-rdi added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 2, 2024
@ohmtech-rdi ohmtech-rdi self-assigned this Feb 2, 2024
@ohmtech-rdi ohmtech-rdi merged commit 5b92f75 into main Feb 2, 2024
21 checks passed
@ohmtech-rdi ohmtech-rdi deleted the erb-persistent-no-rate-limit branch February 2, 2024 11:48
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant